139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34869760)
1. Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand.
Techavipoo U; Sinsuebphon N; Prompalit S; Thongvigitmanee S; Narkbuakaew W; Kiang-Ia A; Srivongsa T; Thajchayapong P; Chaumrattanakul U
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3102673. PubMed ID: 34869760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation Between Contrast-Detail Analysis and Clinical Image Quality Assessment of Intrapulmonary Lesions in Dual-Energy Subtraction Chest Radiography Using the Two-Shot Method: A Phantom Study.
Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Kanzaki Y; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y
Acad Radiol; 2024 May; 31(5):2118-2127. PubMed ID: 38008645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low contrast detectability and spatial resolution with model-based Iterative reconstructions of MDCT images: a phantom and cadaveric study.
Millon D; Vlassenbroek A; Van Maanen AG; Cambier SE; Coche EE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):927-937. PubMed ID: 27300195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographers' Ability to Detect Low-Contrast Detail in Digital Radiography Systems.
Alsleem H; Davidson R
Radiol Technol; 2015; 87(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 26377266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic quantitative low contrast analysis of digital chest phantom radiographs.
Kwan AL; Filipow LJ; Le LH
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 12674230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
Ploussi A; Alexopoulou E; Economopoulos N; Argentos SI; Tsitsia V; Arapakis I; Kordolaimi S; Seimenis I; Efstathopoulos EP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 24107575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction of motion artifacts in cone-beam CT using a patient-specific respiratory motion model.
Zhang Q; Hu YC; Liu F; Goodman K; Rosenzweig KE; Mageras GS
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2901-9. PubMed ID: 20632601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ITERATIVE SCATTER CORRECTION FOR GRID-LESS BEDSIDE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: PERFORMANCE FOR A CHEST PHANTOM.
Mentrup D; Jockel S; Menser B; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survey of chest radiography systems: Any link between contrast detail measurements and visual grading analysis?
Rodríguez Pérez S; Marshall NW; Binst J; Coolen J; Struelens L; Bosmans H
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():62-71. PubMed ID: 32599376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.
Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5238-51. PubMed ID: 26328973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between the visual evaluation of pathology visibility and the physical measure of low contrast detail detectability in neonatal chest radiography.
Al-Murshedi S; Benhalim M; Alzyoud K; Papathanasiou S; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Nov; 28(4):1116-1121. PubMed ID: 36099681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
