These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34869760)

  • 21. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.
    De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.
    Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; England A
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180317. PubMed ID: 29906239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimization of standard patient radiographic images for chest, skull and pelvis exams in conventional x-ray equipment.
    Pina DR; Duarte SB; Ghilardi Netto T; Trad CS; Brochi MA; de Oliveira SC
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):N215-26. PubMed ID: 15357201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative performance analysis for abdominal phantom ROI detectability according to CT reconstruction algorithm: ADMIRE.
    Shin JB; Yoon DK; Pak S; Kwon YH; Suh TS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 31729832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of image quality in chest, hip and pelvis examinations between mobile equipment in nursing homes and static indirect radiography equipment in the hospital.
    Precht H; Hansen DL; Ring-Pedersen BM; Møller Hansen LF; Waaler D; Tingberg A; Midtgaard M; Jensen Ohlsen MG; Juhl Hankelbjerg ST; Ravn P; Jensen IE; Christensen JK; Blackburn Andersen PA
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e31-e37. PubMed ID: 32052778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image quality and dose differences caused by vendor-specific image processing of neonatal radiographs.
    Sensakovic WF; O'Dell MC; Letter H; Kohler N; Rop B; Cook J; Logsdon G; Varich L
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Oct; 46(11):1606-13. PubMed ID: 27488507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 18259814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT.
    Gay F; Pavia Y; Pierrat N; Lasalle S; Neuenschwander S; Brisse HJ
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 23995879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Optimization of the chest exposure condition with a contrast-detail phantom: evaluation of the flat-panel versus computed radiography systems].
    Kinoshita E; Umezu Y; Ogawa K; Katou T; Arimura H; Yoshikawa H; Higashida Y; Ooki M; Toyofuku F
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jul; 60(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 15340278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation between physical measurements and observer evaluations of image quality in digital chest radiography.
    Yalcin A; Olgar T; Sancak T; Atac GK; Akyar S
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3935-3944. PubMed ID: 32427360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.