159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34870448)
1. Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?
Komarla R; Gilliland L; Piraner M; Seidel R; Clifford K; Kunjummen J
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211013. PubMed ID: 34870448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast lesions diagnosed by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy: Can shearwave elastography predict histologic upgrade after surgery or vaccuum assisted excision?
Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 49():150-155. PubMed ID: 29524785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classic lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: a clinical and radio-pathologic correlation study with follow-up excision biopsy.
Chaudhary S; Lawrence L; McGinty G; Kostroff K; Bhuiya T
Mod Pathol; 2013 Jun; 26(6):762-71. PubMed ID: 23307062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benign breast papillomas without atypia diagnosed with core needle biopsy: Outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up.
Polat DS; Knippa EE; Ganti R; Seiler SJ; Goudreau SH
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109237. PubMed ID: 32905954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The risk of upgrade for atypical ductal hyperplasia detected on magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy: a study of 100 cases from four academic institutions.
Khoury T; Li Z; Sanati S; Desouki MM; Chen X; Wang D; Liu S; Karabakhtsian R; Kumar P; Reig B
Histopathology; 2016 Apr; 68(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 26291517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting Upgrade of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Breast Cancer at Surgery With Ultrafast Imaging.
Miceli R; Gao Y; Qian K; Heller SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 36752370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: imaging characteristics, outcome of surgical excision or imaging follow-up.
Okamoto S; Chen ST; Covelli JD; DeMartini WB; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM
Breast Cancer; 2020 May; 27(3):405-414. PubMed ID: 31838725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 12-year review of MRI-detected breast cancers. How often was a diagnosis of malignancy established using targeted ultrasound and standard 14-gauge core biopsy?
Price J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2022 Sep; 66(6):738-748. PubMed ID: 34837348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-Risk Lesions Detected by MRI-Guided Core Biopsy: Upgrade Rates at Surgical Excision and Implications for Management.
Michaels AY; Ginter PS; Dodelzon K; Naunheim MR; Abbey GN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):622-632. PubMed ID: 33439046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-risk lesions in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy: upgrade rates and features associated with malignancy.
Cha E; Ambinder EB; Oluyemi ET; Mullen LA; Panigrahi B; Rossi J; Di Carlo PA; Myers KS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Dec; 196(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 36242709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flat Epithelial Atypia in Breast Core Needle Biopsies With Radiologic-Pathologic Concordance: Is Excision Necessary?
Grabenstetter A; Brennan S; Salagean ED; Morrow M; Brogi E
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):182-190. PubMed ID: 31609784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does Initial Imaging Modality Affect Breast Biopsy Upgrade Rates? A Single Institution Review.
Scott RB; Dolkar T; Vidhun R; Osler T; Staradub VL
Conn Med; 2016; 80(6):335-40. PubMed ID: 27509639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) at Breast MRI: Predictors of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma.
Lamb LR; Lehman CD; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1394-1399. PubMed ID: 31699638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mucocele-like lesions diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Low risk of upgrade and subsequent carcinoma.
Zhang G; Ataya D; L Lebda P; Calhoun BC
Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):314-318. PubMed ID: 29024198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image-guided core breast biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a non-calcified abnormality.
DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Harvey SC; Smith DN
Eur J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 30(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 10452723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
