These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34870616)

  • 21. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
    Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radio-protective aprons during radiological examinations of the thorax: an optimum strategy.
    Jackson G; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 16782981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A New Design of a Lead-Acrylic Shield for Staff Dose Reduction in Radial and Femoral Access Coronary Catheterization.
    Eder H; Seidenbusch MC; Treitl M; Gilligan P
    Rofo; 2015 Oct; 187(10):915-23. PubMed ID: 26085177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
    Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
    Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
    Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
    Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of gonad protection in diagnostic radiology].
    Kawaura C; Aoyama T; Koyama S
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 15226646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Shielding during dental X-ray examinations. Effectiveness of radiation protection measures for patients during X-ray examinations].
    Roth J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2006; 116(11):1151-7. PubMed ID: 17144626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Emission of fluorescent x-radiation from non-lead based shielding materials of protective clothing: a radiobiological problem?
    Schmid E; Panzer W; Schlattl H; Eder H
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):N129-39. PubMed ID: 22809876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology.
    Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):460-8. PubMed ID: 17151067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Examination of optimal radiation quality in the lead equivalent examination of X-ray protective clothing].
    Inoue S; Matsumoto M; Matsuzawa R
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1682-7. PubMed ID: 15614219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Armadillo: a protective clothing as a shield from x-radiation.
    TANNER JM; WHITEHOUSE RH; POWELL JH
    Lancet; 1958 Oct; 2(7050):779-80. PubMed ID: 13589001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiation protection of staff in 111In radionuclide therapy--is the lead apron shielding effective?
    Lyra M; Charalambatou P; Sotiropoulos M; Diamantopoulos S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):272-6. PubMed ID: 21816731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of the radiation protective apron on the response of active and passive personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology.
    Ginjaume M; Carinou E; Brodecki M; Clairand I; Domienik-Andrzejewska J; Exner L; Ferrari P; Jovanović Z; Krstic D; Principi S; Van Hoey O; Vanhavere F
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Mar; 39(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 30523896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Determination of the dose to persons assisting when X-radiation is used in medicine, dentistry and veterinary medicine.
    Hupe O; Ankerhold U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):478-81. PubMed ID: 21062800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. IEC 61331-1: A new setup for testing lead free X-ray protective clothing.
    Eder H; Schlattl H
    Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():6-11. PubMed ID: 29472092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Equipment performance and radiation protection status in X-ray fluoroscopy units in Sudan.
    Ahmed NA; Nayl AI; Suliman II
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 21317144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons?
    Bartal G; Sailer AM; Vano E
    Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 29471995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dosemeter readings and effective dose to the cardiologist with protective clothing in a simulated interventional procedure.
    Schultz FW; Zoetelief J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):311-5. PubMed ID: 18388175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.