190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34871355)
41. The health, environmental, and economic dimensions of future dietary transitions in Argentina.
Arrieta EM; Fischer CG; Aguiar S; Geri M; Fernández RJ; Coquet JB; Scavuzzo CM; Rieznik A; León A; González AD; Jobbágy EG
Sustain Sci; 2022 Jan; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 35069916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The role of meat in strategies to achieve a sustainable diet lower in greenhouse gas emissions: A review.
Hyland JJ; Henchion M; McCarthy M; McCarthy SN
Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():189-195. PubMed ID: 28460836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ethical and economic implications of the adoption of novel plant-based beef substitutes in the USA: a general equilibrium modelling study.
Mason-D'Croz D; Barnhill A; Bernstein J; Bogard J; Dennis G; Dixon P; Fanzo J; Herrero M; McLaren R; Palmer J; Rieder T; Rimmer M; Faden R
Lancet Planet Health; 2022 Aug; 6(8):e658-e669. PubMed ID: 35932786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Healthy diets with reduced environmental impact? - The greenhouse gas emissions of various diets adhering to the Dutch food based dietary guidelines.
van de Kamp ME; van Dooren C; Hollander A; Geurts M; Brink EJ; van Rossum C; Biesbroek S; de Valk E; Toxopeus IB; Temme EHM
Food Res Int; 2018 Feb; 104():14-24. PubMed ID: 29433779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. How dietary transition changed land use in Mexico.
Tello J; Garcillán PP; Ezcurra E
Ambio; 2020 Oct; 49(10):1676-1684. PubMed ID: 31994027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Direct and indirect impacts of crop-livestock organization on mixed crop-livestock systems sustainability: a model-based study.
Sneessens I; Veysset P; Benoit M; Lamadon A; Brunschwig G
Animal; 2016 Nov; 10(11):1911-1922. PubMed ID: 27167725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biodiversity effects of food system sustainability actions from farm to fork.
Read QD; Hondula KL; Muth MK
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Apr; 119(15):e2113884119. PubMed ID: 35377808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Balancing virtual land imports by a shift in the diet. Using a land balance approach to assess the sustainability of food consumption. Germany as an example.
Meier T; Christen O; Semler E; Jahreis G; Voget-Kleschin L; Schrode A; Artmann M
Appetite; 2014 Mar; 74():20-34. PubMed ID: 24269506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Recommendations for Integrating Evidence-Based, Sustainable Diet Information into Nutrition Education.
Bastian GE; Buro D; Palmer-Keenan DM
Nutrients; 2021 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 34836423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Sustainability assessment of organic waste management in three EU Cities: Analysing stakeholder-based solutions.
Sanjuan-Delmás D; Taelman SE; Arlati A; Obersteg A; Vér C; Óvári Á; Tonini D; Dewulf J
Waste Manag; 2021 Aug; 132():44-55. PubMed ID: 34304021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations.
Aubin J; Vieux F; Le Féon S; Tharrey M; Peyraud JL; Darmon N
Animal; 2024 May; ():101182. PubMed ID: 38845292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Food Waste and Nutrition Quality in the Context of Public Health: A Scoping Review.
Brennan A; Browne S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34070070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Gaps between fruit and vegetable production, demand, and recommended consumption at global and national levels: an integrated modelling study.
Mason-D'Croz D; Bogard JR; Sulser TB; Cenacchi N; Dunston S; Herrero M; Wiebe K
Lancet Planet Health; 2019 Jul; 3(7):e318-e329. PubMed ID: 31326072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef systems: performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs.
Klopatek SC; Marvinney E; Duarte T; Kendall A; Yang XC; Oltjen JW
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 34936699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Daily cost of consumer food wasted, inedible, and consumed in the United States, 2001-2016.
Conrad Z
Nutr J; 2020 Apr; 19(1):35. PubMed ID: 32306976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Towards healthier and more sustainable diets in the Australian context: comparison of current diets with the Australian Dietary Guidelines and the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet.
Hendrie GA; Rebuli MA; James-Martin G; Baird DL; Bogard JR; Lawrence AS; Ridoutt B
BMC Public Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):1939. PubMed ID: 36261800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Towards a sustainable diet combining economic, environmental and nutritional objectives.
Donati M; Menozzi D; Zighetti C; Rosi A; Zinetti A; Scazzina F
Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():48-57. PubMed ID: 26921487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Dietary recommendations in Spain -affordability and environmental sustainability?
González-García S; Green RF; Scheelbeek PF; Harris F; Dangour AD
J Clean Prod; 2020 May; 254():120125. PubMed ID: 33897918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Role of Food Industry in Promoting Healthy and Sustainable Diets.
Miller KB; Eckberg JO; Decker EA; Marinangeli CPF
Nutrients; 2021 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 34444900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Opportunities, challenges and trade-offs with decreasing avoidable food waste in the UK.
Patel S; Dora M; Hahladakis JN; Iacovidou E
Waste Manag Res; 2021 Mar; 39(3):473-488. PubMed ID: 33517869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
