These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34871786)

  • 1. [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term].
    Bagory H; De Broucker C; Tourneux P; Balcaen T; Gondry J; Foulon A; Sergent F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Mar; 50(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 34871786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Taliento C; Manservigi M; Tormen M; Cappadona R; Piccolotti I; Salvioli S; Scutiero G; Greco P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():108-128. PubMed ID: 37660506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mode of delivery after labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone versus oral misoprostol for women with unfavorable cervix at term.
    Jolivet S; Delavallade M; Giraud A; Chauleur C; Raia-Barjat T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jun; 285():7-11. PubMed ID: 37023496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Induction of labour with oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol: A before-after study].
    Duvillier C; Gams J; Rousseau A; Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Jun; 50(6):475-480. PubMed ID: 35151915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor].
    Girault A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
    Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Goffinet F; Durand-Zaleski I; Ville Y; Vayssiere C; Roberto A; Lahna Z; Nisand I; Fisch C; Chaumet-Riffaud P; Chastang C
    BJOG; 2001 Dec; 108(12):1255-62. PubMed ID: 11843388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fetal safety of vaginal Misoprostol tablet and Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: An open-label randomized control trial.
    Samanta A; Rakshit BM; Mistri PK; Chakraborty A; Bag T; Das P; Pande A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2267-2272. PubMed ID: 37421158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
    Crane JM; Butler B; Young DC; Hannah ME
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1366-76. PubMed ID: 17081181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.