These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34871786)

  • 21. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term.
    Faucett AM; Daniels K; Lee HC; El-Sayed YY; Blumenfeld YJ
    J Perinatol; 2014 Feb; 34(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 24157494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor.
    Crane JM; Young DC; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):926-31. PubMed ID: 11384698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor.
    Mayer RB; Oppelt P; Shebl O; Pömer J; Allerstorfer C; Weiss C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():89-93. PubMed ID: 26995147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review.
    Kundodyiwa TW; Alfirevic Z; Weeks AD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. PubMed ID: 19155909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study.
    Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial.
    Wang X; Zhang C; Li X; Qi H; Liu Q; Lei J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 154(3):436-443. PubMed ID: 33336360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes.
    Rankin K; Chodankar R; Raymond K; Bhaskar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():93-96. PubMed ID: 30122321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oral misoprostol versus intravaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a comparison study.
    Neri C; Familiari A; Preziosi F; Vassallo C; Botta A; Lanzone A; Carducci B; Caruso A
    Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Aug; 70(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 29376620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial.
    Dodd JM; Crowther CA; Robinson JS
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7540):509-13. PubMed ID: 16455695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA; Brown R; Plante LA; Miller H; Rugarn O; Powers BL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):201-209. PubMed ID: 23857539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative study of dinoprostone and misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 35 weeks.
    Sire F; Ponthier L; Eyraud JL; Catalan C; Aubard Y; Coste Mazeau P
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):14996. PubMed ID: 36056056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.