These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34872545)
1. The urologist's learning curve of "in-bore" magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy. Rosenzweig B; Drori T; Raz O; Goldinger G; Shlomai G; Zilberman DE; Shechtman M; Ramon J; Dotan ZA; Portnoy O BMC Urol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34872545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Institutional Learning Curve of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Temporal Improvements in Cancer Detection in 4 Years. Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Deng FM; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29886090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer. Venderink W; van der Leest M; van Luijtelaar A; van de Ven WJM; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1849-1855. PubMed ID: 28871396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Kilic M; Vural M; Coskun B; Acar Ö; Saglican Y; Akpek S; Esen T Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 31054811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-Bore Versus Fusion MRI-Targeted Biopsy of PI-RADS Category 4 and 5 Lesions: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis Using Propensity Score Weighting. Prince M; Foster BR; Kaempf A; Liu JJ; Amling CL; Isharwal S; Chen Y; Coakley FV AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1123-1130. PubMed ID: 33646819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions. Yaxley AJ; Yaxley JW; Thangasamy IA; Ballard E; Pokorny MR BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120 Suppl 3():43-50. PubMed ID: 28749035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in men with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance-ultrasound software-based fusion targeted biopsy. Perrin A; Venderink W; Patak MA; Möckel C; Fehr JL; Jichlinski P; Porcellini B; Lucca I; Futterer J; Valerio M Urol Oncol; 2021 May; 39(5):297.e9-297.e16. PubMed ID: 33341358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure. Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-bore 3.0-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Repeat Biopsy Population: Diagnostic Performance, Complications, and Learning Curve. Friedl A; Schneeweiss J; Sevcenco S; Eredics K; Kunit T; Susani M; Kivaranovic D; Eisenhuber-Stadler E; Lusuardi L; Brössner C; Schima W Urology; 2018 Apr; 114():139-146. PubMed ID: 29330001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer; comparison between FUSION and "IN-BORE" approaches. D'Agostino D; Casablanca C; Mineo Bianchi F; Corsi P; Romagnoli D; Giampaoli M; Fiori C; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Artibani W; Porreca A Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Feb; 73(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 32456413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies. Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy. Hosseiny M; Shakeri S; Felker ER; Lu D; Sayre J; Ahuja P; Raman SS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 32755166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Tan N; Lin WC; Khoshnoodi P; Asvadi NH; Yoshida J; Margolis DJ; Lu DS; Wu H; Sung KH; Lu DY; Huang J; Raman SS Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):130-139. PubMed ID: 27861110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of MRI-Targeted in-Bore Prostate Biopsy According to the Gleason Score with Postprostatectomy Histopathologic Control--a Targeted Biopsy-Only Strategy with Limited Number of Cores. Garmer M; Busch M; Mateiescu S; Fahlbusch DE; Wagener B; Grönemeyer DH Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1409-18. PubMed ID: 26343218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3? Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard. Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Arsov C; Lanzman RS; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Antoch G; Albers P; Blondin D Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3185-90. PubMed ID: 23756958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR. Rosenkrantz AB; Verma S; Choyke P; Eberhardt SC; Eggener SE; Gaitonde K; Haider MA; Margolis DJ; Marks LS; Pinto P; Sonn GA; Taneja SS J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 27320841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-Bore MRI-guided Prostate Biopsies: Retrospective Observational Study of Complementary Nontargeted Sampling of Normal-appearing Areas at Multiparametric MRI. Elfatairy KK; Filson CP; Sanda MG; Osunkoya AO; Nour SG Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2019 Nov; 1(2):e190016. PubMed ID: 33778681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool. Gaziev G; Wadhwa K; Barrett T; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Serrao E; Frey J; Seidenader J; Carmona L; Warren A; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Kastner C BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25099182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]