BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34873180)

  • 21. [General overview on DNA repair].
    Pourquier P; Robert J
    Bull Cancer; 2011 Mar; 98(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 21414892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pericentromeric regions are refractory to prompt repair after replication stress-induced breakage in HPV16 E6E7-expressing epithelial cells.
    Deng W; Tsao SW; Guan XY; Cheung AL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48576. PubMed ID: 23119062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Near-tetraploid cancer cells show chromosome instability triggered by replication stress and exhibit enhanced invasiveness.
    Wangsa D; Quintanilla I; Torabi K; Vila-Casadesús M; Ercilla A; Klus G; Yuce Z; Galofré C; Cuatrecasas M; Lozano JJ; Agell N; Cimini D; Castells A; Ried T; Camps J
    FASEB J; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3502-3517. PubMed ID: 29452566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Replication stress drives chromosomal instability in fibroblasts of childhood cancer survivors with second primary neoplasms.
    Zahnreich S; Yusifli K; Poplawski A; Eckhard LS; Mirsch J; Hankeln T; Galetzka D; Marron M; Scholz-Kreisel P; Spix C; Schmidberger H
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2023 Feb; 122():103435. PubMed ID: 36549044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transcription as a Threat to Genome Integrity.
    Gaillard H; Aguilera A
    Annu Rev Biochem; 2016 Jun; 85():291-317. PubMed ID: 27023844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. EMSY overexpression disrupts the BRCA2/RAD51 pathway in the DNA-damage response: implications for chromosomal instability/recombination syndromes as checkpoint diseases.
    Cousineau I; Belmaaza A
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2011 Apr; 285(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 21409565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mutational signature SBS8 predominantly arises due to late replication errors in cancer.
    Singh VK; Rastogi A; Hu X; Wang Y; De S
    Commun Biol; 2020 Aug; 3(1):421. PubMed ID: 32747711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel measure of chromosome instability can account for prognostic difference in multiple myeloma.
    Chung TH; Mulligan G; Fonseca R; Chng WJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66361. PubMed ID: 23840451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Telomere dysfunction, genome instability and cancer.
    Cheung AL; Deng W
    Front Biosci; 2008 Jan; 13():2075-90. PubMed ID: 17981693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. RNA polymerase II contributes to preventing transcription-mediated replication fork stalls.
    Felipe-Abrio I; Lafuente-Barquero J; García-Rubio ML; Aguilera A
    EMBO J; 2015 Jan; 34(2):236-50. PubMed ID: 25452497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The sources of variation in the human genome and genome instability in human cancers.
    Diculescu GL
    Rom J Physiol; 1997; 34(1-4):3-17. PubMed ID: 9653805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Understanding the molecular basis of common fragile sites instability: role of the proteins involved in the recovery of stalled replication forks.
    Franchitto A; Pichierri P
    Cell Cycle; 2011 Dec; 10(23):4039-46. PubMed ID: 22101264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Single cell genomics reveals activation signatures of endogenous SCAR's networks in aneuploid human embryos and clinically intractable malignant tumors.
    Glinsky GV
    Cancer Lett; 2016 Oct; 381(1):176-93. PubMed ID: 27497790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 3D genome organization contributes to genome instability at fragile sites.
    Sarni D; Sasaki T; Irony Tur-Sinai M; Miron K; Rivera-Mulia JC; Magnuson B; Ljungman M; Gilbert DM; Kerem B
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3613. PubMed ID: 32680994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Increased genome instability in human DNA segments with self-chains: homology-induced structural variations via replicative mechanisms.
    Zhou W; Zhang F; Chen X; Shen Y; Lupski JR; Jin L
    Hum Mol Genet; 2013 Jul; 22(13):2642-51. PubMed ID: 23474816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of chromosomal instability on colorectal cancer progression and outcome.
    Orsetti B; Selves J; Bascoul-Mollevi C; Lasorsa L; Gordien K; Bibeau F; Massemin B; Paraf F; Soubeyran I; Hostein I; Dapremont V; Guimbaud R; Cazaux C; Longy M; Theillet C
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14():121. PubMed ID: 24559140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast.
    Admire A; Shanks L; Danzl N; Wang M; Weier U; Stevens W; Hunt E; Weinert T
    Genes Dev; 2006 Jan; 20(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 16384935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The DNA damage response pathway contributes to the stability of chromosome III derivatives lacking efficient replicators.
    Theis JF; Irene C; Dershowitz A; Brost RL; Tobin ML; di Sanzo FM; Wang JY; Boone C; Newlon CS
    PLoS Genet; 2010 Dec; 6(12):e1001227. PubMed ID: 21151954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. G-Quadruplex Assembly by Ribosomal DNA: Emerging Roles in Disease Pathogenesis and Cancer Biology.
    Datta A; Pollock KJ; Kormuth KA; Brosh RM
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2021; 161(6-7):285-296. PubMed ID: 34469893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mutational Strand Asymmetries in Cancer Genomes Reveal Mechanisms of DNA Damage and Repair.
    Haradhvala NJ; Polak P; Stojanov P; Covington KR; Shinbrot E; Hess JM; Rheinbay E; Kim J; Maruvka YE; Braunstein LZ; Kamburov A; Hanawalt PC; Wheeler DA; Koren A; Lawrence MS; Getz G
    Cell; 2016 Jan; 164(3):538-49. PubMed ID: 26806129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.