These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34873867)

  • 1. On the numerical treatment of viscous and convective effects in relative pressure reconstruction methods.
    Pacheco DRQ
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Mar; 38(3):e3562. PubMed ID: 34873867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure mapping from flow imaging: enhancing computation of the viscous term through velocity reconstruction in near-wall regions.
    Donati F; Nordsletten DA; Smith NP; Lamata P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():5097-100. PubMed ID: 25571139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of 4D Flow based relative pressure maps in aortic flows.
    Nolte D; Urbina J; Sotelo J; Sok L; Montalba C; Valverde I; Osses A; Uribe S; Bertoglio C
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Dec; 74():102195. PubMed ID: 34419837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic relative pressure components derived from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Lamata P; Pitcher A; Krittian S; Nordsletten D; Bissell MM; Cassar T; Barker AJ; Markl M; Neubauer S; Smith NP
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):1162-9. PubMed ID: 24243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Turbulent convective length scale in planetary cores.
    Guervilly C; Cardin P; Schaeffer N
    Nature; 2019 Jun; 570(7761):368-371. PubMed ID: 31217600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A divergence-free semi-implicit finite volume scheme for ideal, viscous, and resistive magnetohydrodynamics.
    Dumbser M; Balsara DS; Tavelli M; Fambri F
    Int J Numer Methods Fluids; 2019 Jan; 89(1-2):16-42. PubMed ID: 31293284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Force balance in rapidly rotating Rayleigh-Bénard convection.
    Guzmán AJA; Madonia M; Cheng JS; Ostilla-Mónico R; Clercx HJH; Kunnen RPJ
    J Fluid Mech; 2021 Dec; 928():. PubMed ID: 34671171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forces and stresses acting on fusion pore membrane during secretion.
    Tajparast M; Glavinović MI
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 May; 1788(5):1009-23. PubMed ID: 19366587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite-difference and integral schemes for Maxwell viscous stress calculation in immersed boundary simulations of viscoelastic membranes.
    Li P; Zhang J
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2667-2681. PubMed ID: 32621160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Convective thermal cloaks with homogeneous and isotropic parameters and drag-free characteristics for viscous potential flows.
    Yao N; Wang H; Wang B; Wang X; Huang J
    iScience; 2022 Nov; 25(11):105461. PubMed ID: 36388976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pore-scale effects during the transition from capillary- to viscosity-dominated flow dynamics within microfluidic porous-like domains.
    Yiotis A; Karadimitriou NK; Zarikos I; Steeb H
    Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3891. PubMed ID: 33594146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fully developed Darcy-Forchheimer mixed convective flow over a curved surface with activation energy and entropy generation.
    Muhammad R; Khan MI; Jameel M; Khan NB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 May; 188():105298. PubMed ID: 31923819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the accuracy of viscous and turbulent loss quantification in stenotic aortic flow using phase-contrast MRI.
    Binter C; Gülan U; Holzner M; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jul; 76(1):191-6. PubMed ID: 26258402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plethora of transitions during breakup of liquid filaments.
    Castrejón-Pita JR; Castrejón-Pita AA; Thete SS; Sambath K; Hutchings IM; Hinch J; Lister JR; Basaran OA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(15):4582-7. PubMed ID: 25825761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 4D Flow MRI-based pressure loss estimation in stenotic flows: Evaluation using numerical simulations.
    Casas B; Lantz J; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1808-21. PubMed ID: 26016805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pulsatile magneto-hydrodynamic blood flows through porous blood vessels using a third grade non-Newtonian fluids model.
    Akbarzadeh P
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():3-19. PubMed ID: 26792174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
    Rifkin RD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causal impulse response for circular sources in viscous media.
    Kelly JF; McGough RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2107-16. PubMed ID: 18397018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The pressure-flow relation for plasma in whole organ skeletal muscle and its experimental verification.
    Sutton DW; Schmid-Schönbein GW
    J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 1762443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Bohning DE; Pettigrew RI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 1446110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.