BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34875014)

  • 21. Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC).
    Arnedos M; Nerurkar A; Osin P; A'Hern R; Smith IE; Dowsett M
    Ann Oncol; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1948-52. PubMed ID: 19570962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in the fine needle aspirates of metastatic breast carcinomas.
    Monaco SE; Wu Y; Teot LA; Cai G
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 22045649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High Ki-67 Expression and Low Progesterone Receptor Expression Could Independently Lead to a Worse Prognosis for Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
    Nishimukai A; Yagi T; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Enomoto Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Sakita I; Hatada T; Miyoshi Y
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 25600243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in the ER, PgR, HER2, p53 and Ki-67 biological markers between primary and recurrent breast cancer: discordance rates and prognosis.
    Nishimura R; Osako T; Okumura Y; Tashima R; Toyozumi Y; Arima N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 9():131. PubMed ID: 22004841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases.
    Aurilio G; Disalvatore D; Pruneri G; Bagnardi V; Viale G; Curigliano G; Adamoli L; Munzone E; Sciandivasci A; De Vita F; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 24269135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Validation Study of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry Digital Imaging Analysis and its Correlation with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Fluorescence
    Hartage R; Li AC; Hammond S; Parwani AV
    J Pathol Inform; 2020; 11():2. PubMed ID: 32154039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Progesterone receptor loss identifies Luminal B breast cancer subgroups at higher risk of relapse.
    Cancello G; Maisonneuve P; Rotmensz N; Viale G; Mastropasqua MG; Pruneri G; Montagna E; Iorfida M; Mazza M; Balduzzi A; Veronesi P; Luini A; Intra M; Goldhirsch A; Colleoni M
    Ann Oncol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):661-8. PubMed ID: 23022996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hormone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Detection in Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 12,467 Patients From 19 Chinese Representative Clinical Centers.
    Shui R; Liang X; Li X; Liu Y; Li H; Xu E; Zhang Z; Lian Y; Guo S; Yao M; Yang H; Xu F; Liu Y; Liu J; Guo D; Wang K; Li J; Ma Y; Wang J; Shi J; Bu H; Yang W
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):e65-e74. PubMed ID: 31669267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Assessing the Value of Repeated Centralized Testing in Excision Specimens.
    Hariri N; Hasteh F; Walavalkar V; Roma AA; Fadare O
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2019 Jan; 27(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28549033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ER and PR immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus oncotype DX: implications for breast cancer treatment.
    Park MM; Ebel JJ; Zhao W; Zynger DL
    Breast J; 2014; 20(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 24261318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Updated CAP guidelines for determining molecular biological subtypes of breast cancer].
    Zavalishina LE; Oliushina EM; Andreeva YY; Kuznetsova OA; Moskvina LV; Frank GA
    Arkh Patol; 2023; 85(4):39-46. PubMed ID: 37530189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surrogate Molecular Classification of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Comparison Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Excision, With and Without Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Ambrosini-Spaltro A; Zunarelli E; Bettelli S; Lupi M; Bernardelli G; Milani M; Ficarra G
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2020 Aug; 28(7):551-557. PubMed ID: 31335485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative digital imaging analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry predicts the response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast carcinoma.
    Li AC; Zhao J; Zhao C; Ma Z; Hartage R; Zhang Y; Li X; Parwani AV
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Apr; 180(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 32002765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantitative ER and PgR assessment as predictors of benefit from lapatinib in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
    Finn RS; Press MF; Dering J; O'Rourke L; Florance A; Ellis C; Martin AM; Johnston S
    Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Feb; 20(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 24198242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013.
    Ehinger A; Malmström P; Bendahl PO; Elston CW; Falck AK; Forsare C; Grabau D; Rydén L; Stål O; Fernö M;
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27762648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prognostic significance of estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors' status conversion following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Results from a tertiary Cancer Center in Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Saleh K; Salah T; Arafah M; Husain S; Al-Rikabi A; Abd El-Aziz N
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247802. PubMed ID: 33667252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform.
    Wu NC; Wong W; Ho KE; Chu VC; Rizo A; Davenport S; Kelly D; Makar R; Jassem J; Duchnowska R; Biernat W; Radecka B; Fujita T; Klein JL; Stonecypher M; Ohta S; Juhl H; Weidler JM; Bates M; Press MF
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Nov; 172(2):327-338. PubMed ID: 30120700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of host and histopathological factors on the discrepancies in estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor, and HER2 status between core needle biopsy and surgically excised tumors.
    Nakamura R; Yamamoto N; Shiina N; Miyaki T; Ikebe D; Itami M; Shida T; Miyazaki M
    Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():141-7. PubMed ID: 26732051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of ER/PR and HER2 statuses in primary and paired liver metastatic sites of breast carcinoma in patients with or without treatment.
    Liu J; Deng H; Jia W; Zeng Y; Rao N; Li S; Jin L; Wu J; Song E; Su F
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2012 May; 138(5):837-42. PubMed ID: 22290394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Incidence, Clinicopathologic Features, HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Profile, and Oncotype DX Results of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Breast Cancers: Experience From a Single Academic Center.
    Hu Y; Jones D; Zhao W; Tozbikian G; Wesolowski R; Parwani AV; Li Z
    Mod Pathol; 2023 Jul; 36(7):100164. PubMed ID: 36967073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.