These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34875054)
1. External validation of a frequently used prediction model for ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Youssef A; van der Hoorn MLP; Dongen M; Visser J; Bloemenkamp K; van Lith J; van Geloven N; Lashley EELO Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 34875054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A nomogram and risk stratification to predict subsequent pregnancy loss in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Li M; Zhou R; Yu D; Chen D; Zhao A Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct; 39(10):2221-2232. PubMed ID: 39178353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study. Bhatt SJ; Marchetto NM; Roy J; Morelli SS; McGovern PG Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recurrent pregnancy loss: what is the impact of consecutive versus non-consecutive losses? Egerup P; Kolte AM; Larsen EC; Krog M; Nielsen HS; Christiansen OB Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2428-2434. PubMed ID: 27591241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients. Popescu F; Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study. Leijdekkers JA; Eijkemans MJC; van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; McLernon DJ; Bhattacharya S; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL; Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1684-1695. PubMed ID: 30085143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure. Sato T; Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozawa F; Yamamoto T; Kato T; Kurahashi H; Kuroda T; Aoyama N; Kato K; Kobayashi R; Fukuda A; Utsunomiya T; Kuwahara A; Saito H; Takeshita T; Irahara M Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31811307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydroxychloroquine in recurrent pregnancy loss: data from a French prospective multicenter registry. Dernoncourt A; Hedhli K; Abisror N; Cheloufi M; Cohen J; Kolanska K; McAvoy C; Selleret L; Ballot E; Mathieu d'Argent E; Chabbert Buffet N; Fain O; Kayem G; Mekinian A Hum Reprod; 2024 Sep; 39(9):1934-1941. PubMed ID: 38942601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence, causes, and impact of non-visualized pregnancy losses in a recurrent pregnancy loss population. Bedaiwy MA; Fayek B; Yang EC; Iews MS; Elgendi M; Abdelkareem AO; Abdellah AH; Liu YD; Jones A; Mayer U; Abdel Hafez FF Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):830-839. PubMed ID: 36881694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Kolte AM; van Oppenraaij RH; Quenby S; Farquharson RG; Stephenson M; Goddijn M; Christiansen OB; Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 24603132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of the 'uterine factor' in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective cohort study on women screened through 3D transvaginal ultrasound. Busnelli A; Barbaro G; Pozzati F; D'Ippolito S; Cristodoro M; Nobili E; Scambia G; Di Simone N Hum Reprod; 2024 Aug; 39(8):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 38964365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External validation of a dynamic prediction model for repeated predictions of natural conception over time. van Eekelen R; McLernon DJ; van Wely M; Eijkemans MJ; Bhattacharya S; van der Veen F; van Geloven N Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 33(12):2268-2275. PubMed ID: 30358841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples' perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up. Koert E; Malling GMH; Sylvest R; Krog MC; Kolte AM; Schmidt L; Nielsen HS Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):291-296. PubMed ID: 30561641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022. ; Bender Atik R; Christiansen OB; Elson J; Kolte AM; Lewis S; Middeldorp S; Mcheik S; Peramo B; Quenby S; Nielsen HS; van der Hoorn ML; Vermeulen N; Goddijn M Hum Reprod Open; 2023; 2023(1):hoad002. PubMed ID: 36873081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A history of recurrent pregnancy loss is associated with increased perinatal complications, but not necessarily a longer birth interval: a population study spanning 18 years. Cho K; Fayek B; Liu YD; Albert A; Wiesenthal E; Dobrer S; AbdelHafez FF; Lisonkova S; Bedaiwy MA Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38390658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Natural conception: repeated predictions over time. van Eekelen R; Scholten I; Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; van der Steeg JW; Steures P; Hompes P; van Wely M; van der Veen F; Mol BW; Eijkemans MJ; Te Velde ER; van Geloven N Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):346-353. PubMed ID: 27993999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time to conception and time to live birth in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp SP; van Mens TE; Middeldorp S; Hutten BA; Hof MH; van der Post JA; van der Veen F; Goddijn M Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 24682612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction model for clinical pregnancy for ICSI after surgical sperm retrieval in different types of azoospermia. Song J; Gu L; Ren X; Liu Y; Qian K; Lan R; Wang T; Jin L; Yang J; Liu J Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):1972-1982. PubMed ID: 32730569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]