255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34875054)
1. External validation of a frequently used prediction model for ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
Youssef A; van der Hoorn MLP; Dongen M; Visser J; Bloemenkamp K; van Lith J; van Geloven N; Lashley EELO
Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 34875054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study.
Bhatt SJ; Marchetto NM; Roy J; Morelli SS; McGovern PG
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recurrent pregnancy loss: what is the impact of consecutive versus non-consecutive losses?
Egerup P; Kolte AM; Larsen EC; Krog M; Nielsen HS; Christiansen OB
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2428-2434. PubMed ID: 27591241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
Popescu F; Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward more accurate prediction of future pregnancy outcome in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: taking both partners into account.
du Fossé NA; van der Hoorn MP; de Koning R; Mulders AGMGJ; van Lith JMM; le Cessie S; Lashley EELO
Fertil Steril; 2022 Jan; 117(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 34863518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study.
Leijdekkers JA; Eijkemans MJC; van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; McLernon DJ; Bhattacharya S; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1684-1695. PubMed ID: 30085143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.
Sato T; Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozawa F; Yamamoto T; Kato T; Kurahashi H; Kuroda T; Aoyama N; Kato K; Kobayashi R; Fukuda A; Utsunomiya T; Kuwahara A; Saito H; Takeshita T; Irahara M
Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31811307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence, causes, and impact of non-visualized pregnancy losses in a recurrent pregnancy loss population.
Bedaiwy MA; Fayek B; Yang EC; Iews MS; Elgendi M; Abdelkareem AO; Abdellah AH; Liu YD; Jones A; Mayer U; Abdel Hafez FF
Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):830-839. PubMed ID: 36881694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
Kolte AM; van Oppenraaij RH; Quenby S; Farquharson RG; Stephenson M; Goddijn M; Christiansen OB;
Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 24603132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of a dynamic prediction model for repeated predictions of natural conception over time.
van Eekelen R; McLernon DJ; van Wely M; Eijkemans MJ; Bhattacharya S; van der Veen F; van Geloven N
Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 33(12):2268-2275. PubMed ID: 30358841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples' perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up.
Koert E; Malling GMH; Sylvest R; Krog MC; Kolte AM; Schmidt L; Nielsen HS
Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):291-296. PubMed ID: 30561641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022.
; Bender Atik R; Christiansen OB; Elson J; Kolte AM; Lewis S; Middeldorp S; Mcheik S; Peramo B; Quenby S; Nielsen HS; van der Hoorn ML; Vermeulen N; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod Open; 2023; 2023(1):hoad002. PubMed ID: 36873081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A history of recurrent pregnancy loss is associated with increased perinatal complications, but not necessarily a longer birth interval: a population study spanning 18 years.
Cho K; Fayek B; Liu YD; Albert A; Wiesenthal E; Dobrer S; AbdelHafez FF; Lisonkova S; Bedaiwy MA
Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38390658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the role of paternal factors in aetiology and prognosis of recurrent pregnancy loss: study protocol for a hospital-based multicentre case-control study and cohort study (REMI III project).
du Fossé N; van der Hoorn ML; Eikmans M; Heidt S; le Cessie S; Mulders A; van Lith J; Lashley E
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033095. PubMed ID: 31727666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Natural conception: repeated predictions over time.
van Eekelen R; Scholten I; Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; van der Steeg JW; Steures P; Hompes P; van Wely M; van der Veen F; Mol BW; Eijkemans MJ; Te Velde ER; van Geloven N
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):346-353. PubMed ID: 27993999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Time to conception and time to live birth in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
Kaandorp SP; van Mens TE; Middeldorp S; Hutten BA; Hof MH; van der Post JA; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 24682612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction model for clinical pregnancy for ICSI after surgical sperm retrieval in different types of azoospermia.
Song J; Gu L; Ren X; Liu Y; Qian K; Lan R; Wang T; Jin L; Yang J; Liu J
Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):1972-1982. PubMed ID: 32730569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss.
; Bender Atik R; Christiansen OB; Elson J; Kolte AM; Lewis S; Middeldorp S; Nelen W; Peramo B; Quenby S; Vermeulen N; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod Open; 2018; 2018(2):hoy004. PubMed ID: 31486805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting the chances of having a baby with or without treatment at different time points in couples with unexplained subfertility.
McLernon DJ; Lee AJ; Maheshwari A; van Eekelen R; van Geloven N; Putter H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Steeg JW; van der Veen F; Steyerberg EW; Mol BW; Bhattacharya S
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1126-1138. PubMed ID: 31119290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting the success of IVF: external validation of the van Loendersloot's model.
Sarais V; Reschini M; Busnelli A; Biancardi R; Paffoni A; Somigliana E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1245-52. PubMed ID: 27076503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
