These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34875379)

  • 1. Causal analysis of existing databases: no power calculations required. Responses to Campbell, Morris and Mansournia, et al.
    Hernán MA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():193. PubMed ID: 34875379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal analyses of existing databases: no power calculations required.
    Hernán MA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():203-205. PubMed ID: 34461211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advances in Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Section.
    Wiedermann W; Dong N; von Eye A
    Prev Sci; 2019 Apr; 20(3):390-393. PubMed ID: 30645732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conformity to the power PC theory of causal induction depends on the type of probe question.
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 16618631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal analyses of existing databases: the importance of understanding what can be achieved with your data before analysis (commentary on Hernán).
    Morris TP; van Smeden M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 142():261-263. PubMed ID: 34560253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of selected causality theories].
    Thoemmes F
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):880-3. PubMed ID: 22193896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response to: 'Associations of regular glucosamine use with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: causality assumptions need to be checked' by Safiri and Mansournia.
    Li ZH; Huang QM; Mao C
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2022 May; 81(5):e86. PubMed ID: 32461204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. There is no virtue in vagueness: Comment on: Causal Identification: A Charge of Epidemiology in Danger of Marginalization by Sharon Schwartz, Nicolle M. Gatto, and Ulka B. Campbell.
    Kaufman JS
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):683-684. PubMed ID: 27641315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A lack of statistical pitfalls in the comparison of multivariate causality measures for effective causality.
    Frye RE
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Aug; 43(7):962-5. PubMed ID: 23485200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causal knowledge in evidence-based medicine. In reply to Kerry et al.'s causation and evidence-based practice: an ontological review.
    Strand A; Parkkinen VP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):981-4. PubMed ID: 24134302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings.
    Shadish WR
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20230099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An economist's perspective on Shadish (2010) and West and Thoemmes (2010).
    Imbens GW
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20230102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction to the special section on Campbell's and Rubin's conceptualizations of causality.
    Maxwell SE
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20230098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating effective brain connectivity from fMRI data: past findings and current issues with reference to Granger causality analysis.
    Deshpande G; Hu X
    Brain Connect; 2012; 2(5):235-45. PubMed ID: 23016794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference.
    Barnett L; Seth AK
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Feb; 223():50-68. PubMed ID: 24200508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model selection and gobbledygook: response to Lohmann et al.
    Friston K; Daunizeau J; Stephan KE
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 75():275-278. PubMed ID: 22155029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causation in evidence-based medicine: in reply to Kerry et al.
    Strand A; Parkkinen VP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Jun; 21(3):532-4. PubMed ID: 25675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keil et al. Respond to "Causal Inference for Environmental Mixtures".
    Keil AP; Buckley JP; Kalkbrenner AE
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 190(12):2662-2663. PubMed ID: 34079996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Campbell's and Rubin's perspectives on causal inference.
    West SG; Thoemmes F
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 20230100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.