These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34875566)

  • 1. Removal of micropollutants from municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Conventional membrane versus dynamic membrane.
    Isik O; Erbil MC; Abdelrahman AM; Ersahin ME; Koyuncu I; Ozgun H; Demir I
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114233. PubMed ID: 34875566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of ultrafiltration and dynamic membranes in an aerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Isik O; Abdelrahman AM; Ozgun H; Ersahin ME; Demir I; Koyuncu I
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(32):32723-32733. PubMed ID: 30847818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
    Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operation of a modified anaerobic baffled reactor coupled with a membrane bioreactor for the treatment of municipal wastewater in Taiwan.
    Sung HN; Katsou E; Statiris E; Anguilano L; Malamis S
    Environ Technol; 2019 Apr; 40(10):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 29307278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies to enhance micropollutant removal from wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Recent advances and future perspectives.
    Liu W; Song X; Na Z; Li G; Luo W
    Bioresour Technol; 2022 Jan; 344(Pt B):126322. PubMed ID: 34785336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
    Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
    Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment.
    Luo Y; Guo W; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Zhang J; Liang S; Wang XC
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():619-41. PubMed ID: 24394371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of membrane bioreactor (MBR) and activated sludge processes in the treatment of Moroccan domestic wastewater.
    Kitanou S; Tahri M; Bachiri B; Mahi M; Hafsi M; Taky M; Elmidaoui A
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 78(5-6):1129-1136. PubMed ID: 30339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors.
    Ersahin ME; Ozgun H; Tao Y; van Lier JB
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():420-9. PubMed ID: 24156951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal of pharmaceuticals from wastewater of health care facilities.
    Mousel D; Bastian D; Firk J; Palmowski L; Pinnekamp J
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jan; 751():141310. PubMed ID: 32861185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applications of membrane bioreactors for water reclamation: Micropollutant removal, mechanisms and perspectives.
    Ma J; Dai R; Chen M; Khan SJ; Wang Z
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Dec; 269():532-543. PubMed ID: 30195697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two PAC/UF processes for the removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent: process performance and removal efficiency.
    Löwenberg J; Zenker A; Baggenstos M; Koch G; Kazner C; Wintgens T
    Water Res; 2014 Jun; 56():26-36. PubMed ID: 24631942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid MF and membrane bioreactor process applied towards water and indigo reuse from denim textile wastewater.
    Couto CF; Marques LS; Balmant J; de Oliveira Maia AP; Moravia WG; Santos Amaral MC
    Environ Technol; 2018 Mar; 39(6):725-738. PubMed ID: 28338418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of hydraulic retention time on the performance of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system for micropollutants removal from municipal wastewater.
    Jiang Q; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Price WE; Zhang J; Liang S; Deng L; Guo W
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jan; 247():1228-1232. PubMed ID: 28958886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of simultaneous retention of micropollutants and laccase on micropollutant degradation in enzymatic membrane bioreactor.
    Asif MB; Hai FI; Dhar BR; Ngo HH; Guo W; Jegatheesan V; Price WE; Nghiem LD; Yamamoto K
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Nov; 267():473-480. PubMed ID: 30036848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance assessment of the indigenous ceramic UF membrane in bioreactor process for highly polluted tannery wastewater treatment.
    Banerjee S; Santra B; Kar S; Banerjee D; Ghosh S; Majumdar S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(32):48620-48637. PubMed ID: 35199268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement of municipal wastewater pretreatment by direct membrane filtration.
    Nascimento TA; Mejía FR; Fdz-Polanco F; Peña Miranda M
    Environ Technol; 2017 Oct; 38(20):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 27931165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal and fate of emerging organic micropollutants (EOMs) in municipal wastewater by a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment under varying solid retention times.
    Gurung K; Ncibi MC; Sillanpää M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 667():671-680. PubMed ID: 30833265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pilot trial study of a compact macro-filtration membrane bioreactor process for saline wastewater treatment.
    Guan D; Fung WC; Lau F; Deng C; Leung A; Dai J; Chen GH
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 25026589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.