BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34875767)

  • 1. The conflation of ignorance and knowledge in the inference of clade posteriors.
    Randle CP; Pickett KM
    Cladistics; 2010 Oct; 26(5):550-559. PubMed ID: 34875767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strange bayes indeed: uniform topological priors imply non-uniform clade priors.
    Pickett KM; Randle CP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):203-11. PubMed ID: 15579393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2108-18. PubMed ID: 17636043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibrated birth-death phylogenetic time-tree priors for bayesian inference.
    Heled J; Drummond AJ
    Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):369-83. PubMed ID: 25398445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian inference with adaptive fuzzy priors and likelihoods.
    Osoba O; Mitaim S; Kosko B
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2011 Oct; 41(5):1183-97. PubMed ID: 21478078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choice of topology estimators in Bayesian phylogenetic analysis.
    Sukumaran J; Linkem CW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18984901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genealogical Working Distributions for Bayesian Model Testing with Phylogenetic Uncertainty.
    Baele G; Lemey P; Suchard MA
    Syst Biol; 2016 Mar; 65(2):250-64. PubMed ID: 26526428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
    Lewis PO; Holder MT; Holsinger KE
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 16012095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implications of uniformly distributed, empirically informed priors for phylogeographical model selection: a reply to Hickerson et al.
    Oaks JR; Linkem CW; Sukumaran J
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3607-17. PubMed ID: 25213163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tail paradox, partial identifiability, and influential priors in Bayesian branch length inference.
    Rannala B; Zhu T; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Jan; 29(1):325-35. PubMed ID: 21890479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.
    Yang Z; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 16012111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nucleotide Substitution Model Selection Is Not Necessary for Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny With Well-Behaved Priors.
    Guimarães Fabreti L; Höhna S
    Syst Biol; 2023 Dec; 72(6):1418-1432. PubMed ID: 37455495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian Estimation with Informative Priors is Indistinguishable from Data Falsification.
    García-Pérez MÁ
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 22():E45. PubMed ID: 31640834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
    de Queiroz K; Poe S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness of compound Dirichlet priors for Bayesian inference of branch lengths.
    Zhang C; Rannala B; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2012 Oct; 61(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 22328570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of the Tree Prior on Molecular Dating of Data Sets Containing a Mixture of Inter- and Intraspecies Sampling.
    Ritchie AM; Lo N; Ho SYW
    Syst Biol; 2017 May; 66(3):413-425. PubMed ID: 27798404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplicity as a Cue to Probability: Multiple Roles for Simplicity in Evaluating Explanations.
    Vrantsidis TH; Lombrozo T
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Jul; 46(7):e13169. PubMed ID: 35738485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How vague is vague? How informative is informative? Reference analysis for Bayesian meta-analysis.
    Ott M; Plummer M; Roos M
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(20):4505-4521. PubMed ID: 34041768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of globally obtained informative priors on bayesian safety performance functions developed for Australian crash data.
    Afghari AP; Haque MM; Washington S; Smyth T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():55-65. PubMed ID: 31108237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.