BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34875794)

  • 1. The deterministic effects of alignment bias in phylogenetic inference.
    Simmons MP; Müller KF; Webb CT
    Cladistics; 2011 Aug; 27(4):402-416. PubMed ID: 34875794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alignment of, and phylogenetic inference from, random sequences: the susceptibility of alternative alignment methods to creating artifactual resolution and support.
    Simmons MP; Müller KF; Norton AP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Dec; 57(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20849963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative sensitivity of different alignment methods and character codings in sensitivity analysis.
    Simmons MP; Müller KF; Webb CT
    Cladistics; 2008 Dec; 24(6):1039-1050. PubMed ID: 34892886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence of Statistical Inconsistency of Phylogenetic Methods in the Presence of Multiple Sequence Alignment Uncertainty.
    Md Mukarram Hossain AS; Blackburne BP; Shah A; Whelan S
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Jul; 7(8):2102-16. PubMed ID: 26139831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SATe-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees.
    Liu K; Warnow TJ; Holder MT; Nelesen SM; Yu J; Stamatakis AP; Linder CR
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 22139466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phylogenetic Tree Estimation With and Without Alignment: New Distance Methods and Benchmarking.
    Bogusz M; Whelan S
    Syst Biol; 2017 Mar; 66(2):218-231. PubMed ID: 27633353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments.
    Higgins DG; Thompson JD; Gibson TJ
    Methods Enzymol; 1996; 266():383-402. PubMed ID: 8743695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GUIDANCE2: accurate detection of unreliable alignment regions accounting for the uncertainty of multiple parameters.
    Sela I; Ashkenazy H; Katoh K; Pupko T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jul; 43(W1):W7-14. PubMed ID: 25883146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fully automated sequence alignment methods are comparable to, and much faster than, traditional methods in large data sets: an example with hepatitis B virus.
    Catanach TA; Sweet AD; Nguyen ND; Peery RM; Debevec AH; Thomer AK; Owings AC; Boyd BM; Katz AD; Soto-Adames FN; Allen JM
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6142. PubMed ID: 30627489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PhyPA: Phylogenetic method with pairwise sequence alignment outperforms likelihood methods in phylogenetics involving highly diverged sequences.
    Xia X
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Sep; 102():331-43. PubMed ID: 27377322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: a case study of 18S rDNAs of apicomplexa.
    Morrison DA; Ellis JT
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Apr; 14(4):428-41. PubMed ID: 9100373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty in homology inferences: assessing and improving genomic sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Rocco A; Mimouni N; Heger A; Caldeira A; Hein J
    Genome Res; 2008 Feb; 18(2):298-309. PubMed ID: 18073381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing Statistical Multiple Sequence Alignment and Tree Inference Using Structural Information.
    Herman JL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1851():183-214. PubMed ID: 30298398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ancestral sequence alignment under optimal conditions.
    Hudek AK; Brown DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():273. PubMed ID: 16293191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current Methods for Automated Filtering of Multiple Sequence Alignments Frequently Worsen Single-Gene Phylogenetic Inference.
    Tan G; Muffato M; Ledergerber C; Herrero J; Goldman N; Gil M; Dessimoz C
    Syst Biol; 2015 Sep; 64(5):778-91. PubMed ID: 26031838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of pairwise and multiple sequence alignment errors.
    Landan G; Graur D
    Gene; 2009 Jul; 441(1-2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18614299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving pairwise sequence alignment accuracy using near-optimal protein sequence alignments.
    Sierk ML; Smoot ME; Bass EJ; Pearson WR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 11():146. PubMed ID: 20307279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular systematics of terraranas (Anura: Brachycephaloidea) with an assessment of the effects of alignment and optimality criteria.
    Padial JM; Grant T; Frost DR
    Zootaxa; 2014 Jun; 3825():1-132. PubMed ID: 24989881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alignment errors strongly impact likelihood-based tests for comparing topologies.
    Levy Karin E; Susko E; Pupko T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Nov; 31(11):3057-67. PubMed ID: 25085999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.