These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34876253)

  • 41. Preoperative Myocardial Injury as a Predictor of Mortality in Emergency General Surgery: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database.
    Zimmerman AM; Marwaha J; Nunez H; Harrington D; Heffernan D; Monaghan S; Adams C; Stephen A
    J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Aug; 223(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 27163647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessment of the American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator of outcomes after hepatectomy for liver tumors: Results from a cohort of 950 patients.
    Donadon M; Galvanin J; Branciforte B; Palmisano A; Procopio F; Cimino M; Del Fabbro D; Torzilli G
    Int J Surg; 2020 Dec; 84():102-108. PubMed ID: 33099020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Predictive Power of the NSQIP Risk Calculator for Early Post-Operative Outcomes After Whipple: Experience from a Regional Center in Northern Ontario.
    Jiang HY; Kohtakangas EL; Asai K; Shum JB
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2018 Sep; 49(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 28462447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Examining the validity of the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator in plastic surgery: lack of input specificity, outcome variability and imprecise risk calculations.
    Johnson C; Campwala I; Gupta S
    J Investig Med; 2017 Mar; 65(3):722-725. PubMed ID: 27793973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. ACS NSQIP risk calculator reliability in head and neck oncology: The effect of prior chemoradiation on NSQIP risk estimates following laryngectomy.
    Cao A; Khayat S; Cash E; Nickel C; Gettelfinger J; Tennant P; Bumpous J
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(2):192-196. PubMed ID: 29174070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An Assessment of 30-Day Complications in Primary Cleft Palate Repair: A Review of the 2012 ACS NSQIP Pediatric.
    Paine KM; Paliga JT; Tahiri Y; Fischer JP; Wes AM; Wink JD; Gelder CA; Taylor JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 26120887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Serum albumin levels predict which patients are at increased risk for complications following surgical management of acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
    Gupta A; Upadhyaya S; Cha T; Schwab J; Bono C; Hershman S
    Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1796-1802. PubMed ID: 31255789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Length of hospital stay after craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.
    Dasenbrock HH; Liu KX; Devine CA; Chavakula V; Smith TR; Gormley WB; Dunn IF
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E12. PubMed ID: 26621410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Associations Between Preoperative Risk, Postoperative Complications, and 30-Day Mortality.
    Madsen HJ; Henderson WG; Bronsert MR; Dyas AR; Colborn KL; Lambert-Kerzner A; Meguid RA
    World J Surg; 2022 Oct; 46(10):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 35778512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Community level socioeconomic status association with surgical outcomes and resource utilisation in a regional cohort: a prospective registry analysis.
    Mehaffey JH; Hawkins RB; Charles EJ; Turrentine FE; Kaplan B; Fogel S; Harris C; Reines D; Posadas J; Ailawadi G; Hanks JB; Hallowell PT; Jones RS
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2020 Mar; 29(3):232-237. PubMed ID: 31540969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Preoperative risk stratification of patient mortality following elective craniotomy; a comparative analysis of prediction algorithms.
    Rutkowski M; Sankaran S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 67():24-31. PubMed ID: 31279701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program as a quality-measurement tool for advanced cancer patients.
    Vidri RJ; Blakely AM; Kulkarni SS; Vaghjiani RG; Heffernan DS; Harrington DT; Cioffi WG; Miner TJ
    Ann Palliat Med; 2015 Oct; 4(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 26541399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Cervical Spine Surgery?
    McCarthy MH; Singh P; Maslak J; Nayak R; Jenkins TJ; Hsu WK; Patel AA
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Nov; 32(9):357-362. PubMed ID: 31567532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Predicting risk of death in general surgery patients on the basis of preoperative variables using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.
    Vaid S; Bell T; Grim R; Ahuja V
    Perm J; 2012; 16(4):10-7. PubMed ID: 23251111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator poorly predicts complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.
    Golan S; Adamsky MA; Johnson SC; Barashi NS; Smith ZL; Rodriguez MV; Liao C; Smith ND; Steinberg GD; Shalhav AL
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):77.e1-77.e7. PubMed ID: 29033195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Analysis of Outcomes After TKA: Do All Databases Produce Similar Findings?
    Bedard NA; Pugely AJ; McHugh M; Lux N; Otero JE; Bozic KJ; Gao Y; Callaghan JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 29529616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program give different results in hip fracture studies.
    Bohl DD; Basques BA; Golinvaux NS; Baumgaertner MR; Grauer JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1672-80. PubMed ID: 24615426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Can the American College of Surgeons NSQIP surgical risk calculator identify patients at risk of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction?
    O'Neill AC; Bagher S; Barandun M; Hofer SO; Zhong T
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Oct; 69(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 27325513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Refining the predictive variables in the "Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System" (SURPAS): a descriptive analysis.
    Henderson WG; Bronsert MR; Hammermeister KE; Lambert-Kerzner A; Meguid RA
    Patient Saf Surg; 2019; 13():28. PubMed ID: 31452684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Future: Here and Now.
    Rosemurgy A; Ross S; Bourdeau T; Craigg D; Spence J; Alvior J; Sucandy I
    J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Apr; 228(4):613-624. PubMed ID: 30682410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.