These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34876507)

  • 1. Inequality, identity, and partisanship: How redistribution can stem the tide of mass polarization.
    Stewart AJ; Plotkin JB; McCarty N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(50):. PubMed ID: 34876507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'Them' without 'us': negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil.
    Areal J
    Political Res Exch; 2022; 4(1):2117635. PubMed ID: 36147779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do Polarization Narratives Apply to Politics on the Periphery? The Case of Atlantic Canada.
    McLay R; Ramos H
    Front Sociol; 2021; 6():655880. PubMed ID: 34746294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partisan strength, political trust and generalized trust in the United States: An analysis of the General Social Survey, 1972-2014.
    Hooghe M; Oser J
    Soc Sci Res; 2017 Nov; 68():132-146. PubMed ID: 29108592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief.
    Jenke L
    Polit Behav; 2023 Jan; ():1-60. PubMed ID: 36691451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review.
    Bliuc AM; Bouguettaya A; Felise KD
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():641215. PubMed ID: 34733195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society.
    Törnberg P; Andersson C; Lindgren K; Banisch S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258259. PubMed ID: 34634056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting.
    Törnberg P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(42):e2207159119. PubMed ID: 36215484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Belief change in times of crisis: Providing facts about COVID-19-induced inequalities closes the partisan divide but fuels intra-partisan polarization about inequality.
    Mijs JJB; de Koster W; van der Waal J
    Soc Sci Res; 2022 May; 104():102692. PubMed ID: 35400387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interindividual cooperation mediated by partisanship complicates Madison's cure for "mischiefs of faction".
    Kawakatsu M; Lelkes Y; Levin SA; Tarnita CE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(50):. PubMed ID: 34876512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resentment Is Like Drinking Poison? The Heterogeneous Health Effects of Affective Polarization.
    Nelson MH
    J Health Soc Behav; 2022 Dec; 63(4):508-524. PubMed ID: 35148647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline.
    Stewart AJ; McCarty N; Bryson JJ
    Sci Adv; 2020 Dec; 6(50):. PubMed ID: 33310855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeing Red: Anger Increases How Much Republican Identification Predicts Partisan Attitudes and Perceived Polarization.
    Huber M; Van Boven L; Park B; Pizzi WT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139193. PubMed ID: 26407321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dynamics of health care opinion, 2008-2010: partisanship, self-interest, and racial resentment.
    Henderson M; Hillygus DS
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2011 Dec; 36(6):945-60. PubMed ID: 22232419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries.
    Flores A; Cole JC; Dickert S; Eom K; Jiga-Boy GM; Kogut T; Loria R; Mayorga M; Pedersen EJ; Pereira B; Rubaltelli E; Sherman DK; Slovic P; Västfjäll D; Van Boven L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jan; 119(3):. PubMed ID: 35042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of partisan conflict in environmental sustainability targets of the United States.
    Akadiri SS; Alola AA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(10):10265-10274. PubMed ID: 31933092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.
    Van Boven L; Ehret PJ; Sherman DK
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):492-507. PubMed ID: 29961412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship.
    Lee AH; Lelkes Y; Hawkins CB; Theodoridis AG
    Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Jul; 6(7):951-963. PubMed ID: 35589827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes toward legalization of marijuana in the United States, 1986-2016: Changes in determinants of public opinion.
    Denham BE
    Int J Drug Policy; 2019 Sep; 71():78-90. PubMed ID: 31238179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.