These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34877154)
1. X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part II: Sensitivity to Rotation Stage Errors. Muralikrishnan B; Shilling M; Phillips S; Ren W; Lee V; Kim F J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2019; 124():1-13. PubMed ID: 34877154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part I: Sensitivity to Detector Geometry Errors. Muralikrishnan B; Shilling M; Phillips S; Ren W; Lee V; Kim F J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2019; 124():1-16. PubMed ID: 34877158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. X-Ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part III: Sensitivity to Detector Geometry and Rotation Stage Errors at Different Magnifications. Jaganmohan P; Muralikrishnan B; Shilling M; Morse E J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2021; 126():126029. PubMed ID: 38469439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ASME B89.4.23 Performance Evaluation Tests and Geometry Errors in X-Ray Computed Tomography Systems. Muralikrishnan B; Shilling M; Lee V J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2021; 126():126042. PubMed ID: 38469444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems. Cho Y; Moseley DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):968-83. PubMed ID: 15895580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy. Ford JC; Zheng D; Williamson JF Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2829-40. PubMed ID: 21815358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tolerance to geometrical inaccuracies in CBCT systems: A comprehensive study. Abella M; Martinez C; Garcia I; Moreno P; De Molina C; Desco M Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6007-6019. PubMed ID: 34213782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of 3D PSFs from computed tomography reconstructed x-ray images of spherical objects and the effects of sphere radii. Robert N; Mainprize JG; Whyne C Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4792-4802. PubMed ID: 31381159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The geometric calibration of cone-beam systems with arbitrary geometry. Robert N; Watt KN; Wang X; Mainprize JG Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7239-61. PubMed ID: 19926916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A fillable micro-hollow sphere lesion detection phantom using superposition. Difilippo FP; Gallo SL; Klatte RS; Patel S Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5363-81. PubMed ID: 20736497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery. Li J; Shi W; Andrews D; Werner-Wasik M; Lu B; Yu Y; Dicker A; Liu H Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 16(3):339-343. PubMed ID: 28462690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method to determine the detector locations of the cone-beam projection of the balls' centers. Deng L; Xi X; Li L; Han Y; Yan B Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(24):9295-311. PubMed ID: 26580684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geometry calibration method for a cone-beam CT system. Yang H; Kang K; Xing Y Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1692-1706. PubMed ID: 28206667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification. Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X-ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography. Taniguchi T; Hara T; Shimozato T; Hyodo F; Ono K; Nakaya S; Noda Y; Kato H; Tanaka O; Matsuo M J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):271-279. PubMed ID: 34375008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between x-ray illumination field size and flat field intensity and its impacts on x-ray imaging. Dong X; Niu T; Jia X; Zhu L Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5901-9. PubMed ID: 23039629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam imaging with tilted rotation axis: Method and performance evaluation. Zhao C; Herbst M; Vogt S; Ritschl L; Kappler S; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3305-3320. PubMed ID: 32340069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of the geometry and speed of a moving blocker system for cone-beam computed tomography scatter correction. Chen X; Ouyang L; Yan H; Jia X; Li B; Lyu Q; Zhang Y; Wang J Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e215-e229. PubMed ID: 28901608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction for fan beam with an angular-dependent displaced center-of-rotation. Crawford CR; Gullberg GT; Tsui BM Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 3258402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]