These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34877457)
1. Contrast-enhanced mammography: what the radiologist needs to know. Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJF; Alcantara R; Robbe Q; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MBI BJR Open; 2021; 3(1):20210034. PubMed ID: 34877457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Guide to Setting Up a New Clinical Program. Kim G; Patel B; Mehta TS; Du L; Mehta RJ; Phillips J J Breast Imaging; 2021 May; 3(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 38424777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Challenging Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Biopsies: Practical Approach Using Real-Time Multimodality Imaging and a Proposed Procedural Algorithm. Weaver OO; Yang WT; Scoggins ME; Adrada BE; Arribas E; Moseley TW; Esquivel J; Melgar Y; Kornecki A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Apr; 220(4):512-523. PubMed ID: 36321982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes. Alcantara R; Posso M; Pitarch M; Arenas N; Ejarque B; Iotti V; Besutti G Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):417-428. PubMed ID: 35895121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: II. Artefacts/uniformity, exposure time and phantom-based dosimetry. Marshall NW; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37820686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening. Coffey K; Jochelson MS Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110513. PubMed ID: 36108478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current use and future perspectives of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM): a survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI). Schiaffino S; Cozzi A; Clauser P; Giannotti E; Marino MA; van Nijnatten TJA; Baltzer PAT; Lobbes MBI; Mann RM; Pinker K; Fuchsjäger MH; Pijnappel RM; Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):5439-5450. PubMed ID: 38227202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study. Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Fanizza M; Magni V; Menicagli L; Monaco CG; Benedek A; Spinelli D; Di Leo G; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7388-7399. PubMed ID: 35648209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance. Cozzi A; Magni V; Zanardo M; Schiaffino S; Sardanelli F Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):568-581. PubMed ID: 34904875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Barriers to Implementation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Clinical Practice: van Nijnatten TJA; Lobbes MBI; Cozzi A; Patel BK; Zuley ML; Jochelson MS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 36448912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reversal of the hanging protocol of Contrast Enhanced Mammography leads to similar diagnostic performance yet decreased reading times. van Geel K; Kok EM; Krol JP; Houben IPL; Thibault FE; Pijnappel RM; van Merriënboer JJG; Lobbes MBI Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():62-68. PubMed ID: 31307654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography with MRI Utilizing an Enriched Reader Study: A Breast Cancer Study (CONTRRAST Trial). Phillips J; Mehta TS; Portnow LH; Fishman MDC; Zhang Z; Pisano ED Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e230530. PubMed ID: 37962503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of low dose superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer for sentinel node biopsy in breast conserving treatment on susceptibility artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging and contrast enhanced mammography. van Haaren ERM; Spiekerman van Weezelenburg MA; van Bastelaar J; Janssen A; van Nijnatten T; Bouwman LH; Vissers YLJ; Lobbes MBI Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 53():102045. PubMed ID: 38330805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening. Covington MF Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use. Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJ; Meens-Koreman SD; van Stiphout RSA; Timmermans SMEC; Duvivier KM; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22224. PubMed ID: 34782698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artifacts in contrast-enhanced mammography: are there differences between vendors? Neppalli S; Kessell MA; Madeley CR; Hill ML; Vlaskovsky PS; Taylor DB Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():123-130. PubMed ID: 34311215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CEM immediately after contrast-enhanced CT: a one-step staging of breast cancer. Ancona A; Telegrafo M; Fella RR; Iamele D; Cantore S; Moschetta M Eur Radiol Exp; 2024 Apr; 8(1):32. PubMed ID: 38556593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced Mammography-guided Biopsy: Initial Trial and Experience. Kowalski A; Arefan D; Ganott MA; Harnist K; Kelly AE; Lu A; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Vargo A; Berg WA; Zuley ML J Breast Imaging; 2023 Mar; 5(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 38416936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]