These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34877636)

  • 1. Diversity matters: The sensitivity to sublexical orthographic regularities increases with contextual diversity.
    Chetail F; Sauval K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):1003-1016. PubMed ID: 34877636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What do we do with what we learn? Statistical learning of orthographic regularities impacts written word processing.
    Chetail F
    Cognition; 2017 Jun; 163():103-120. PubMed ID: 28319684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Letter is a Letter and its Co-Occurrences: Cracking the Emergence of Position-Invariance Processing.
    Fernández-López M; Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2328-2337. PubMed ID: 37145389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical organization of language-ambiguous and language-specific words in bilinguals.
    Casaponsa A; Duñabeitia JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):589-604. PubMed ID: 26123205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological markers of orthographic pattern learning in school-aged children with reading challenges: An ERP investigation.
    Duan R; Tong X
    Res Dev Disabil; 2024 Aug; 151():104784. PubMed ID: 38941692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning new words by reading books: Does semantic information help?
    Smejkalova A; Chetail F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Mar; 76(3):568-582. PubMed ID: 35400218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Print-, sublexical and lexical processing in children with reading and/or spelling deficits: An ERP study.
    Kemény F; Banfi C; Gangl M; Perchtold CM; Papousek I; Moll K; Landerl K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():53-62. PubMed ID: 29803515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconsidering the role of orthographic redundancy in visual word recognition.
    Chetail F
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():645. PubMed ID: 26042074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the regularities between orthography and semantics and their impact on group- and individual-level behavior.
    Siegelman N; Rueckl JG; Lo JCM; Kearns DM; Morris RD; Compton DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):839-855. PubMed ID: 35084923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contextual diversity during word learning through reading benefits generalisation of learned meanings to new contexts.
    Norman R; Hulme RC; Sarantopoulos C; Chandran V; Shen H; Rodd JM; Joseph H; Taylor JSH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jul; 76(7):1658-1671. PubMed ID: 36282017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.
    Anton KF; Gould L; Borowsky R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):623-44. PubMed ID: 24294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive pre-activation of orthographic and lexical-semantic representations facilitates visual word recognition.
    Eisenhauer S; Gagl B; Fiebach CJ
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Mar; 59(3):e13970. PubMed ID: 34813664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: an artificial orthography paradigm.
    Taylor JS; Plunkett K; Nation K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 20919786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition.
    Grainger J; Mathôt S; Vitu F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():35-40. PubMed ID: 24370788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A general-purpose mechanism of visual feature association in visual word identification and beyond.
    Vidal Y; Viviani E; Zoccolan D; Crepaldi D
    Curr Biol; 2021 Mar; 31(6):1261-1267.e3. PubMed ID: 33417881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of semantic activation during word recognition in Arabic.
    Taha H
    Cogn Process; 2019 Aug; 20(3):333-337. PubMed ID: 30895422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading.
    Bowey JA
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 2381320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the interactivity of lexical orthographic and phonological processing.
    Owen WJ; Borowsky R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Dec; 57(4):290-303. PubMed ID: 14710866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual diversity favors the learning of new words in children regardless of their comprehension skills.
    Rosa E; Salom R; Perea M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Feb; 214():105312. PubMed ID: 34753015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers.
    Perea M; Soares AP; Comesaña M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Sep; 116(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23374607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.