These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34877736)

  • 1. Influence of milking units and working vacuum level on the mechanical milking of goats.
    Caria M; Boselli C; Calvo A; Grande S; Todde G
    Anim Sci J; 2021; 92(1):e13667. PubMed ID: 34877736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine milking parameters for Murciano-Granadina breed goats.
    Fernández N; Martí JV; Rodríguez M; Peris C; Balasch S
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):507-513. PubMed ID: 31629519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows.
    Holst GE; Adrion F; Umstätter C; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4775-4786. PubMed ID: 33612232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for assessing teatcup liner performance during the peak milk flow period.
    Penry JF; Upton J; Leonardi S; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):649-660. PubMed ID: 29102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing liner performance using on-farm milk meters.
    Penry JF; Leonardi S; Upton J; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6609-6618. PubMed ID: 27236765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting mouthpiece chamber vacuum in machine milking.
    Borkhus M; Rønningen O
    J Dairy Res; 2003 Aug; 70(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12916822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mid-line or low-line milking systems on milking characteristics in goats.
    Manzur A; Díaz JR; Mehdid A; Fernández N; Peris C
    J Dairy Res; 2012 Aug; 79(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 22850585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the pulsation type (alternate or simultaneous) on milk yield and health status of the mammary gland of Murciano-Granadina goats.
    Bueso-Ródenas J; Romero G; Navarro A; Pérez E; Díaz JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3339-3347. PubMed ID: 30772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions of vacuum, b-phase duration, and liner compression on milk flow rates in dairy cows.
    Bade RD; Reinemann DJ; Zucali M; Ruegg PL; Thompson PD
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Mar; 92(3):913-21. PubMed ID: 19233784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Besier J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3096-3102. PubMed ID: 26830741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short communication: Effect of vacuum and ratio on the performance of a monoblock silicone milking liner.
    Spencer SB; Shin JW; Rogers GW; Cooper JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1725-8. PubMed ID: 17369212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced liner-open phase and vacuum instead of prestimulation increase parlor efficiency in dairy cows.
    Tuor M; Jenni B; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 34955277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows.
    Odorčić M; Rasmussen MD; Paulrud CO; Bruckmaier RM
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s94-s99. PubMed ID: 31280747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship of goat milk flow emission variables with milking routine, milking parameters, milking machine characteristics and goat physiology.
    Romero G; Panzalis R; Ruegg P
    Animal; 2017 Nov; 11(11):2070-2075. PubMed ID: 28393747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cyclic pressure applied to cows' teats by teatcup liners can be determined simply and noninvasively.
    Thompson PD; Dzidic A; Mein GA; Penry JF; Sanford SA; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):1881-1886. PubMed ID: 33309351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Sensor-Based and Audible Detection of Milking Liner Slips during Machine Milking of Dairy Cows.
    Wieland M; Spellman ME; Case KL; Geary CM; Sipka A
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38474897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the working vacuum level on mechanical milking of buffalo.
    Caria M; Murgia L; Pazzona A
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21426964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of milkline vacuum, pulsator airline vacuum, and cluster weight on milk yield, teat condition, and udder health.
    Rasmussen MD; Madsen NP
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Jan; 83(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 10659967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Stauffer C; Feierabend M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9250-9260. PubMed ID: 32747105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review: Milking routines and cluster detachment levels in small ruminants.
    Dzidic A; Rovai M; Poulet JL; Leclerc M; Marnet PG
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s86-s93. PubMed ID: 31280744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.