These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34878074)

  • 61. Scanning electron microscope analysis of internal adaptation of materials used for pulp protection under composite resin restorations.
    Peliz MI; Duarte S; Dinelli W
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 16036128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Dental resin composites containing ceramic whiskers and precured glass ionomer particles.
    Xu HH; Eichmiller FC; Antonucci JM; Schumacher GE; Ives LK
    Dent Mater; 2000 Sep; 16(5):356-63. PubMed ID: 10915897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Occlusal wear of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement following three surface treatments.
    Wu CH; Smales RJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 11355095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effect of cavity lining on the restoration of root surface carious lesions: a split-mouth, 5-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Koc Vural U; Gokalp S; Kiremitci A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):979-989. PubMed ID: 31273529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Margin Integrity and Secondary Caries of Lined or Non-lined Composite and Glass Hybrid Restorations After Selective Excavation In Vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kniess J; Paris S; Blunck U
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 27802124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice.
    Smales RJ; Ng KK
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15762341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Miller RC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 9545909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Reducing composite restoration polymerization shrinkage stress through resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives.
    Naoum SJ; Mutzelburg PR; Shumack TG; Thode D; Martin FE; Ellakwa AE
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 25476699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of Different Liners on Pulpal Outcome after Partial Caries Removal: A Preliminary 12 Months Randomised Controlled Trial.
    Singh S; Mittal S; Tewari S
    Caries Res; 2019; 53(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 31096259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of novel "super-closed" sandwich composite resin restorations in large MOD defects.
    Magne P; Silva S; Andrada Md; Maia H
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 26835525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Loading and composite restoration assessment of various non-carious cervical lesions morphologies - 3D finite element analysis.
    Soares PV; Machado AC; Zeola LF; Souza PG; Galvão AM; Montes TC; Pereira AG; Reis BR; Coleman TA; Grippo JO
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Sep; 60(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 25312697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Clinical evaluation of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Adeleke ; Oginni A
    J West Afr Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 2(4):21-37. PubMed ID: 25453001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.