These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34879245)

  • 1. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.
    de Oliveira ILM; Hanzen TA; de Paula AM; Perdigão J; Montes MAJR; Loguercio AD; Monteiro GQM
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103918. PubMed ID: 34879245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer does not influence postoperative sensitivity and clinical performance of posterior restorations: A 24-month randomized clinical trial.
    Hanzen TA; de Paula AM; Grokoski E; de Oliveira ILM; Arana-Gordillo LA; de Melo Monteiro GQ; Perdigão J; Loguercio AD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Oct; 39(10):946-956. PubMed ID: 37648563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Dentin Moisture in Posterior Restorations Performed with Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutierrez MF; Chemin K; Mendez-Bauer ML; Bermúdez JP; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):E91-E105. PubMed ID: 35405005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Ñaupari-Villasante R; Falconi-Páez C; Castro AS; Gutiérrez MF; Mendez-Bauer ML; Aliaga P; Dávila-Sánchez A; Arrais C; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105080. PubMed ID: 38788919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentin moisture does not influence postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutiérrez MF; Martini EC; Dreweck FD; Mendez-Bauer L; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):206-212. PubMed ID: 32794396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Lopes LS; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Matos TP; Reis A; Calixto AL; Loguercio AD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4337-4350. PubMed ID: 35142923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of posterior restorations over wet and dry dentin using an etch-and-rinse adhesive: A 36-month randomized clinical trial.
    González CC; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Dos Santos de Castro A; Mendez-Bauer L; Dávila-Sanchez A; Aliaga-Sancho P; Gutierrez MF; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Dent Mater; 2024 Apr; 40(4):619-628. PubMed ID: 38369403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schroeder M; Correa IC; Bauer J; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():36-53. PubMed ID: 28495559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations restored with self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill resin composites: A randomized clinical split-mouth trial.
    Maghaireh GA; Albashaireh ZS; Allouz HA
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104655. PubMed ID: 37562757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial.
    de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Matos TP; Souza JJ; Reis A; Barceleiro MO; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104120. PubMed ID: 35398450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A New Dual-cure Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-month Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial.
    de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Marins SS; Matos T; de Souza JJ; Reis A; de Oliveira Barceleiro M; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):E255-E270. PubMed ID: 33170938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fang K; Chen K; Shi M; Wang L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2495-2511. PubMed ID: 37017757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Oz FD; Ergin E; Canatan S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180358. PubMed ID: 30994773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 17432395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesive applied following different bonding techniques: A randomized multicenter clinical trial.
    Ñaupari-Villasante R; Matos TP; de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Reis A; Barceleiro MO; Loguercio AD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Jun; 39(6):586-594. PubMed ID: 37147235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.