These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34879245)

  • 21. The Effect of Radiotherapy on the Marginal Adaptation of Class II Direct Resin Composite Restorations: A Micro-computed Tomography Analysis.
    Oglakci B; Burduroğlu D; Eriş AH; Mayadağlı A; Arhun N
    Oper Dent; 2022 Jan; 47(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 35226728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin - a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial.
    Carvalho AA; Leite MM; Zago JKM; Nunes CABCM; Barata TJE; Freitas GC; Torres ÉM; Lopes LG
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):252. PubMed ID: 31752813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Marques IP; de Oliveira FBS; Souza JGS; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; França FMG; Popoff DAV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2989-2996. PubMed ID: 29453496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a new universal adhesive applied in the "no-waiting" technique: a randomized clinical trial.
    de Almeida RAM; Lima SNL; Nassif MV; Mattos NHR; de Matos TP; de Jesus Tavarez RR; Cardenas AFM; Bandeca MC; Loguercio AD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):151-163. PubMed ID: 36068369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does the adhesive strategy influence the post-operative sensitivity in adult patients with posterior resin composite restorations?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Reis A; Dourado Loguercio A; Schroeder M; Luque-Martinez I; Masterson D; Cople Maia L
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1052-67. PubMed ID: 26122377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial.
    Massa MG; Trentin GA; Noal FC; Franzon R; Lenzi TL; de Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 35506965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive.
    Atalay C; Ozgunaltay G; Yazici AR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 31468262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin.
    Pintado-Palomino K; de Almeida CVVB; da Motta RJG; Fortes JHP; Tirapelli C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 30218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
    Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Catechin-based Dentin Pretreatment and the Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive: A Two-year Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Costa C; Albuquerque N; Mendonça JS; Loguercio AD; Saboia V; Santiago SL
    Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):473-483. PubMed ID: 32352353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt KL; Poitevin A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 20931252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Loguercio AD; Calazans FS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2023; 31():e20220323. PubMed ID: 36790298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations.
    Mahn E; Rousson V; Heintze S
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):391-403. PubMed ID: 26525003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):407-31. PubMed ID: 23082310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-year clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite using a fourth- and fifth-generation bonding agent.
    Gallo JR; Burgess JO; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Winkler MM; Mercante DE; Davidson JM
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 15986947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.