202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34879730)
1. Response of Different Grapevine Cultivars to Infection by
Reis P; Gaspar A; Alves A; Fontaine F; Rego C
Plant Dis; 2022 May; 106(5):1350-1357. PubMed ID: 34879730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First Report of Wood Canker Caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea, Diplodia seriata, Neofusicoccum parvum, and Lasiodiplodia theobromae on Grapevine in Turkey.
Akgul DS; Savas NG; Eskalen A
Plant Dis; 2014 Apr; 98(4):568. PubMed ID: 30708702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of Botryosphaeriaceae Species as Causal Agents of Trunk Diseases on Grapevines.
Carlucci A; Cibelli F; Lops F; Raimondo ML
Plant Dis; 2015 Dec; 99(12):1678-1688. PubMed ID: 30699521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization and Pathogenicity of
Díaz GA; Valdez A; Halleen F; Ferrada E; Lolas M; Latorre BA
Plant Dis; 2022 Mar; 106(3):925-937. PubMed ID: 34664980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual RNA Sequencing of
Gonçalves MFM; Nunes RB; Tilleman L; Van de Peer Y; Deforce D; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Esteves AC; Alves A
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Dec; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 31816814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Susceptibility of Cultivated and Wild Vitis spp. to Wood Infection by Fungal Trunk Pathogens.
Travadon R; Rolshausen PE; Gubler WD; Cadle-Davidson L; Baumgartner K
Plant Dis; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1529-1536. PubMed ID: 30716856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcriptional response of grapevine to infection with the fungal pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae.
Zhang W; Yan J; Li X; Xing Q; Chethana KWT; Zhao W
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):5387. PubMed ID: 30926851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification and Pathogenicity of Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Diplodia seriata, the Causal Agents of Bot Canker Disease of Grapevines in Mexico.
Úrbez-Torres JR; Leavitt GM; Guerrero JC; Guevara J; Gubler WD
Plant Dis; 2008 Apr; 92(4):519-529. PubMed ID: 30769642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First Report of Lasiodiplodia crassispora as a Pathogen of Grapevine Trunks in South Africa.
van Niekerk JM; Bester W; Halleen F; Crous PW; Fourie PH
Plant Dis; 2010 Aug; 94(8):1063. PubMed ID: 30743452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cultivar- and Wood Area-Dependent Metabolomic Fingerprints of Grapevine Infected by Botryosphaeria Dieback.
Lemaitre-Guillier C; Fontaine F; Roullier-Gall C; Harir M; Magnin-Robert M; Clément C; Trouvelot S; Gougeon RD; Schmitt-Kopplin P; Adrian M
Phytopathology; 2020 Nov; 110(11):1821-1837. PubMed ID: 32597304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Secreted proteins produced by fungi associated with Botryosphaeria dieback trigger distinct defense responses in Vitis vinifera and Vitis rupestris cells.
Stempien E; Goddard ML; Leva Y; Bénard-Gellon M; Laloue H; Farine S; Kieffer-Mazet F; Tarnus C; Bertsch C; Chong J
Protoplasma; 2018 Mar; 255(2):613-628. PubMed ID: 29043572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Epicoccum layuense a potential biological control agent of esca-associated fungi in grapevine.
Del Frari G; Cabral A; Nascimento T; Boavida Ferreira R; Oliveira H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213273. PubMed ID: 30913218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First Report of Lasiodiplodia theobromae Causing Inflorescence Blight of Mango.
Serrato-Diaz LM; Perez-Cuevas M; Rivera-Vargas LI; French-Monar RD
Plant Dis; 2013 Oct; 97(10):1380. PubMed ID: 30722136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genome-Wide Identification of Long Non-coding RNAs Responsive to
Xing Q; Zhang W; Liu M; Li L; Li X; Yan J
Evol Bioinform Online; 2019; 15():1176934319841362. PubMed ID: 30992656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae Species Isolated from Grapevine Cankers in California.
Úrbez-Torres JR; Gubler WD
Plant Dis; 2009 Jun; 93(6):584-592. PubMed ID: 30764399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Global transcriptional analysis suggests Lasiodiplodia theobromae pathogenicity factors involved in modulation of grapevine defensive response.
Paolinelli-Alfonso M; Villalobos-Escobedo JM; Rolshausen P; Herrera-Estrella A; Galindo-Sánchez C; López-Hernández JF; Hernandez-Martinez R
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):615. PubMed ID: 27514986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A protocol for selection of Trichoderma spp. to protect grapevine pruning wounds against Lasiodiplodia theobromae.
Marraschi R; Ferreira ABM; da Silva Bueno RN; Leite JABP; Lucon CMM; Harakava R; Leite LG; Padovani CR; Bueno CJ
Braz J Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 50(1):213-221. PubMed ID: 30637650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining an HA + Cu (II) Site-Targeted Copper-Based Product with a Pruning Wound Protection Program to Prevent Infection with
Reis P; Gaspar A; Alves A; Fontaine F; Rego C
Plants (Basel); 2021 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 34834739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential responses of three grapevine cultivars to Botryosphaeria dieback.
Spagnolo A; Magnin-Robert M; Alayi TD; Cilindre C; Schaeffer-Reiss C; Van Dorsselaer A; Clément C; Larignon P; Ramirez-Suero M; Chong J; Bertsch C; Abou-Mansour E; Fontaine F
Phytopathology; 2014 Oct; 104(10):1021-35. PubMed ID: 24724741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The woody plant-degrading pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae effector LtCre1 targets the grapevine sugar-signaling protein VvRHIP1 to suppress host immunity.
Xing Q; Zhou X; Cao Y; Peng J; Zhang W; Wang X; Wu J; Li X; Yan J
J Exp Bot; 2023 Apr; 74(8):2768-2785. PubMed ID: 36788641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
