158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34879988)
1. Titanium versus zirconia complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A comparison of plaque accumulation.
Curiel-Aguilera FP; Griffiths GR; Rossmann JA; Gonzalez JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):369-375. PubMed ID: 34879988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of peri-implant submucosal microbiota in arches with zirconia or titanium implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Jia P; Yang J; Yue Z; Liu J; Liu Q; Liu Z; Tang L; Hou J
Trials; 2020 Nov; 21(1):979. PubMed ID: 33246481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study.
Tischler M; Patch C; Bidra AS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 29559219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of framework material on the color of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
Yilmaz B; Alp G; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jul; 122(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30910280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study.
Cappare P; Ferrini F; Mariani G; Nagni M; Cattoni F
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(4 Suppl. 1):99-112. PubMed ID: 34425665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction.
Kohal RJ; Patzelt SB; Butz F; Sahlin H
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 23506654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A retrospective study.
Bidra AS; Tischler M; Patch C
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):220-224. PubMed ID: 28689903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective Cohort Evaluation of Full-Arch Zirconia Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Al-Tarawneh S; Thalji G; Shonberg D; Fayz L; Cooper L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):381-390. PubMed ID: 37083903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications and Clinical Considerations of the Implant-Retained Zirconia Complete-Arch Prosthesis with Various Opposing Dentitions.
Gonzalez J; Triplett RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):864-869. PubMed ID: 28708920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Translucent monolithic zirconia titanium-supported FP1 full-arch prosthesis: A novel proof of concept to address esthetic, functional, and biologic challenges.
Pelekanos S; Ntovas P; Rizou V; Pozzi A
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 37975525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface.
Venezia P; Torsello F; Cavalcanti R; D'Amato S
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 25979446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design.
Rojas Vizcaya F
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):501-508. PubMed ID: 27570943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of plaque accumulation and soft-tissue blood flow with the use of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses with mucosal surfaces of different materials: a randomized clinical study.
Kanao M; Nakamoto T; Kajiwara N; Kondo Y; Masaki C; Hosokawa R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1137-43. PubMed ID: 22804816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.
Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia frameworks for implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prosthesis.
Tiossi R; Gomes ÉA; Faria ACL; Rodrigues RCS; Ribeiro RF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):860-866. PubMed ID: 28772024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized clinical trial of zirconia and polyetheretherketone implant abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: A 5-year evaluation.
Ayyadanveettil P; Thavakkara V; Latha N; Pavanan M; Saraswathy A; Kuruniyan MS
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1275-1281. PubMed ID: 33933267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
