139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34880263)
1. Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative cervical strain elastography (E-Cervix) in pregnancy.
Mlodawski J; Mlodawska M; Plusajska J; Detka K; Michalska A; Swiercz G; Sikorski M
Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23689. PubMed ID: 34880263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of strain elastography using in vivo compression in the assessment of the uterine cervix during pregnancy.
Kwak DW; Kim M; Oh SY; Park HS; Kim SJ; Kim MY; Hwang HS
J Perinat Med; 2020 Mar; 48(3):256-265. PubMed ID: 32083451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative elastography of cervical stiffness during the three trimesters of pregnancy with a semiautomatic measurement program: A longitudinal prospective pilot study.
Du L; Lin MF; Wu LH; Zhang LH; Zheng Q; Gu YJ; Xie HN
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Feb; 46(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 31814257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra- and inter-observer variability of evaluation of uterine cervix elastography images during pregnancy.
Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z; Preis K
Ginekol Pol; 2014 May; 85(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 25011217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative cervical elastography: a new approach of cervical insufficiency prediction.
Zhang L; Zheng Q; Xie H; Du L; Wu L; Lin M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Jan; 301(1):207-215. PubMed ID: 31758303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardization of measurement of cervical elastography, its reproducibility, and analysis of baseline clinical factors affecting elastographic parameters.
Seol HJ; Sung JH; Seong WJ; Kim HM; Park HS; Kwon H; Hwang HS; Jung YJ; Kwon JY; Oh SY
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2020 Jan; 63(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 31970127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of cervical elastography: a reproducibility study.
Molina FS; Gómez LF; Florido J; Padilla MC; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 22173854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of cervical elastography at 18 to 22 weeks' gestation in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth.
Patberg ET; Wells M; Vahanian SA; Zavala J; Bhattacharya S; Richmond D; Akerman M; Demishev M; Kinzler WL; Chavez MR; Vintzileos AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):525.e1-525.e9. PubMed ID: 34051170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Cervical Elastography for Prediction of Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Low-Risk Women: A Prospective Study.
Du L; Zhang LH; Zheng Q; Xie HN; Gu YJ; Lin MF; Wu LH
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Apr; 39(4):705-713. PubMed ID: 31626344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of cervix elastography in the late first and second trimester of pregnancy.
Fruscalzo A; Schmitz R; Klockenbusch W; Steinhard J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E101-E107. PubMed ID: 22623133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Valentin L; Bergelin I
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 12230448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal cervical length measurements and quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.
Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Schmidt S; Tekesin I
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E169-74. PubMed ID: 21630183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midtrimester cervical elastography in pregnant women with a history of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Cha HH; Seong WJ; Kim HM; Seol HJ; Sung JH; Park HS; Hwang HS; Kwon H; Jung YJ; Kwon JY; Oh SY
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9191. PubMed ID: 35655076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Feasibility of Cervical Elastography in Predicting Preterm Delivery in Singleton Pregnancy with Short Cervix Following Progesterone Treatment.
Jung YJ; Kwon H; Shin J; Park Y; Heo SJ; Park HS; Oh SY; Sung JH; Seol HJ; Kim HM; Seong WJ; Hwang HS; Jung I; Kwon JY
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33669696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine Cervical Change at Term Examined Using Ultrasound Elastography: A Longitudinal Study.
Park HS; Kwon H; Kwon JY; Jung YJ; Seol HJ; Seong WJ; Kim HM; Hwang HS; Sung JH; Oh SY
J Clin Med; 2020 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 33379228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative elastography for cervical stiffness assessment during pregnancy.
Fruscalzo A; Londero AP; Fröhlich C; Möllmann U; Schmitz R
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():826535. PubMed ID: 24734246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Non-Compressive Transvaginal Cervical Elastography as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Pregnancy: A Repeatability and Reliability Analysis.
Janssen MK; Koelper N; Weatherby M; Werth C; Schwartz N
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 37732906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative cervical elastography during pregnancy: influence of setting features on strain calculation.
Fruscalzo A; Londero AP; Schmitz R
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2015 Jul; 42(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 26576791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elastography in predicting preterm delivery in asymptomatic, low-risk women: a prospective observational study.
Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Milart P; Wozniakowska E; Paszkowski T
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jul; 14():238. PubMed ID: 25041946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elastography for predicting preterm delivery in patients with short cervical length at 18-22 weeks of gestation: a prospective observational study.
Woźniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Wrona W; Paszkowski T
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Jun; 86(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 26255452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
