149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34882056)
1. A method for suppressing respiratory noise in impedance cardiography and comprehensive assessment of noise reduction performance.
Hung PD; Dan CQ; Hai VD
J Med Eng Technol; 2022 Feb; 46(2):116-128. PubMed ID: 34882056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of impedance cardiography dZ/dt complex subtypes using pattern recognition artificial neural networks.
Benouar S; Hafid A; Kedir-Talha M; Seoane F
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2021 Oct; 66(5):515-527. PubMed ID: 34162027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impedance cardiography signal denoising using discrete wavelet transform.
Chabchoub S; Mansouri S; Salah RB
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Sep; 39(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 27376722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robust Arm Impedocardiography Signal Quality Enhancement Using Recursive Signal Averaging and Multi-Stage Wavelet Denoising Methods for Long-Term Cardiac Contractility Monitoring Armbands.
Escalona O; Cullen N; Weli I; McCallan N; Ng KY; Finlay D
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(13):. PubMed ID: 37447749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A New Method of Identifying Characteristic Points in the Impedance Cardiography Signal Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition.
Trybek P; Sobotnicka E; Wawrzkiewicz-Jałowiecka A; Machura Ł; Feige D; Sobotnicki A; Richter-Laskowska M
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modified electrode placements for measurement of hemodynamic parameters using impedance cardiography.
Hai VD; Hung PD; Dan CQ
J Med Eng Technol; 2020; 44(7):357-367. PubMed ID: 32840403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mechano- and impedance cardiography parameters in patients with heart failure in administration of a calcium antagonist. The significance of the Heather index].
Linde M; Ohnhaus EE; Kirch W
Z Kardiol; 1989 Mar; 78(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 2652906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transthoracic impedance cardiography: a noninvasive method of hemodynamic assessment.
Bayram M; Yancy CW
Heart Fail Clin; 2009 Apr; 5(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 19249685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beat-to-beat estimation of stroke volume using impedance cardiography and artificial neural network.
Naidu SMM; Pandey PC; Bagal UR; Hardas SP
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Jun; 56(6):1077-1089. PubMed ID: 29150800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study of Electrode Locations for Joint Acquisition of Impedance- and Electro-cardiography Signals.
Metshein M; Gautier A; Larras B; Frappe A; John D; Cardiff B; Annus P; Land R; Martens O
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():7264. PubMed ID: 34892775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New signal processing techniques for improved precision of noninvasive impedance cardiography.
Nagel JH; Shyu LY; Reddy SP; Hurwitz BE; McCabe PM; Schneiderman N
Ann Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(5):517-34. PubMed ID: 2610423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impedance cardiography for cardiac output estimation in pacemaker patients: review of the literature.
Ovsyshcher I; Furman S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jul; 16(7 Pt 1):1412-22. PubMed ID: 7689207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic evaluation in pregnancy: limitations of impedance cardiography.
Moertl MG; Schlembach D; Papousek I; Hinghofer-Szalkay H; Weiss EM; Lang U; Lackner HK
Physiol Meas; 2012 Jun; 33(6):1015-26. PubMed ID: 22562970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Signal processing technique for non-invasive real-time estimation of cardiac output by inductance cardiography (thoracocardiography).
Bucklar GB; Kaplan V; Bloch KE
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2003 May; 41(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 12803295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous acquisition of functional magnetic resonance images and impedance cardiography.
Cieslak M; Ryan WS; Macy A; Kelsey RM; Cornick JE; Verket M; Blascovich J; Grafton S
Psychophysiology; 2015 Apr; 52(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 25410526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The non-invasive assessment of stroke volume and cardiac output by impedance cardiography: a review.
Newman DG; Callister R
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Aug; 70(8):780-9. PubMed ID: 10447052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cardiac output derived from FloTrac™/Vigileo™ and impedance cardiography during major abdominal surgery.
Kim JY; Kim BR; Lee KH; Kim KW; Kim JH; Lee SI; Kim KT; Choe WJ; Park JS; Kim JW
J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1342-9. PubMed ID: 23803309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of impedance cardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of cardiac function in early-stage breast cancer patients.
Piastopoulou E; Ali P; Bertelli G; Heatley M; Moe M; Murugesan C; Stratton G; Lewis M
Physiol Meas; 2021 Nov; 42(10):. PubMed ID: 34547725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography.
Fellahi JL; Caille V; Charron C; Deschamps-Berger PH; Vieillard-Baron A
Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1553-9. PubMed ID: 19372335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
