These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34882175)
1. Key Aspects of Prognostic Model Development and Interpretation From a Clinical Perspective. Hoesseini A; van Leeuwen N; Sewnaik A; Steyerberg EW; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Lingsma HF; Offerman MPJ JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Feb; 148(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 34882175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Steyerberg EW; Vergouwe Y Eur Heart J; 2014 Aug; 35(29):1925-31. PubMed ID: 24898551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study. Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment. Moons KG; Kengne AP; Grobbee DE; Royston P; Vergouwe Y; Altman DG; Woodward M Heart; 2012 May; 98(9):691-8. PubMed ID: 22397946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of prediction models for nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation study. Slieker RC; van der Heijden AAWA; Siddiqui MK; Langendoen-Gort M; Nijpels G; Herings R; Feenstra TL; Moons KGM; Bell S; Elders PJ; 't Hart LM; Beulens JWJ BMJ; 2021 Sep; 374():n2134. PubMed ID: 34583929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism following treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: systematic review, prognostic model and clinical decision rule, and economic evaluation. Ensor J; Riley RD; Jowett S; Monahan M; Snell KIe; Bayliss S; Moore D; Fitzmaurice D; Health Technol Assess; 2016 Feb; 20(12):i-xxxiii, 1-190. PubMed ID: 26879848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and validation of a dynamic outcome prediction model for paracetamol-induced acute liver failure: a cohort study. Bernal W; Wang Y; Maggs J; Willars C; Sizer E; Auzinger G; Murphy N; Harding D; Elsharkawy A; Simpson K; Larsen FS; Heaton N; O'Grady J; Williams R; Wendon J Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Nov; 1(3):217-225. PubMed ID: 28404094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing prognosis and prediction of treatment response in early rheumatoid arthritis: systematic reviews. Archer R; Hock E; Hamilton J; Stevens J; Essat M; Poku E; Clowes M; Pandor A; Stevenson M Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(66):1-294. PubMed ID: 30501821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review. Toll DB; Janssen KJ; Vergouwe Y; Moons KG J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1085-94. PubMed ID: 19208371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings. Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia. Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer. Groenvold M Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological guidance for the evaluation and updating of clinical prediction models: a systematic review. Binuya MAE; Engelhardt EG; Schats W; Schmidt MK; Steyerberg EW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):316. PubMed ID: 36510134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and Internal Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Post-Stroke Fatigue After Discharge. Su Y; Yuki M; Hirayama K; Otsuki M J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Feb; 30(2):105484. PubMed ID: 33253982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(23):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction models in prehospital and emergency medicine research: How to derive and internally validate a clinical prediction model. Buick JE; Austin PC; Cheskes S; Ko DT; Atzema CL Acad Emerg Med; 2023 Nov; 30(11):1150-1160. PubMed ID: 37266925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation. Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker. Moons KG; Kengne AP; Woodward M; Royston P; Vergouwe Y; Altman DG; Grobbee DE Heart; 2012 May; 98(9):683-90. PubMed ID: 22397945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]