These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34882619)

  • 1. The Impact of Synchronized Cochlear Implant Sampling and Stimulation on Free-Field Spatial Hearing Outcomes: Comparing the ciPDA Research Processor to Clinical Processors.
    Dennison SR; Jones HG; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1262-1272. PubMed ID: 34882619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lateralization of binaural envelope cues measured with a mobile cochlear-implant research processora).
    Dennison SR; Thakkar T; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jun; 153(6):3543-3558. PubMed ID: 37390320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.
    Gray WO; Mayo PG; Goupell MJ; Brown AD
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030411. PubMed ID: 34293981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Synchronized Automatic Gain Control in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients Yields Significant Benefit in Static and Dynamic Listening Conditions.
    Dwyer RT; Chen C; Hehrmann P; Dwyer NC; Gifford RH
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014139. PubMed ID: 34027718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear.
    Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Sheffield SW; Teece K; Olund AP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 24356514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.
    Gibbs BE; Bernstein JGW; Brungart DS; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):1230. PubMed ID: 36050186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.
    Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ; Godar S; Grieco-Calub T; Jones GL; Garadat SN; Agrawal S; Kan A; Todd A; Hess C; Misurelli S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jun; 23(6):476-94. PubMed ID: 22668767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory Attention and Spatial Unmasking in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Misurelli SM; Goupell MJ; Burg EA; Jocewicz R; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520946983. PubMed ID: 32812515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does Bilateral Experience Lead to Improved Spatial Unmasking of Speech in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants?
    Litovsky RY; Misurelli SM
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e35-42. PubMed ID: 26756153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.