These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34882917)
1. Proteomics discovery of protein biomarkers linked to yak meat tenderness as determined by label-free mass spectrometry. Li S; Li C Anim Sci J; 2021; 92(1):e13669. PubMed ID: 34882917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of the proteome affecting changes in tenderness of yak meat during storage by label-free mass spectrometry. Li S; Liu S Vet Med Sci; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1640-1649. PubMed ID: 35441809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative proteomic analysis of beef tenderness of Piemontese young bulls by SWATH-MS. López-Pedrouso M; Lorenzo JM; Di Stasio L; Brugiapaglia A; Franco D Food Chem; 2021 Sep; 356():129711. PubMed ID: 33831824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of proteomic to investigate the different degrees of meat tenderness in Nellore breed. Malheiros JM; Enríquez-Valencia CE; Braga CP; Vieira JCS; Vieira DS; Pereira GL; Curi RA; Neto ORM; Oliveira HN; Padilha PM; Chardulo LAL J Proteomics; 2021 Sep; 248():104331. PubMed ID: 34303863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular mechanisms contributing to the development of beef sensory texture and flavour traits and related biomarkers: Insights from early post-mortem muscle using label-free proteomics. Zhu Y; Hamill RM; Mullen AM; Kelly AL; Gagaoua M J Proteomics; 2023 Aug; 286():104953. PubMed ID: 37390894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-proteomics for the discovery of protein biomarkers of beef tenderness: An overview of integrated studies. Picard B; Gagaoua M Food Res Int; 2020 Jan; 127():108739. PubMed ID: 31882086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Label free shotgun proteomics for the identification of protein biomarkers for beef tenderness in muscle and plasma of heifers. Boudon S; Ounaissi D; Viala D; Monteils V; Picard B; Cassar-Malek I J Proteomics; 2020 Apr; 217():103685. PubMed ID: 32058039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Post-mortem muscle proteome of crossbred bulls and steers: Relationships with carcass and meat quality. Santiago B; Baldassini W; Neto OM; Chardulo LA; Torres R; Pereira G; Curi R; Chiaratti MR; Padilha P; Alessandroni L; Gagaoua M J Proteomics; 2023 Apr; 278():104871. PubMed ID: 36898612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Growth Performance and Meat Quality Evaluations in Three-Way Cross Cattle Developed for the Tibetan Plateau and their Molecular Understanding by Integrative Omics Analysis. Cao XK; Cheng J; Huang YZ; Wang XG; Ma YL; Peng SJ; Chaogetu B; Zhuoma Z; Chen H J Agric Food Chem; 2019 Jan; 67(1):541-550. PubMed ID: 30596412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcriptomic analysis of yak Jing K; Mipam TD; Zhang P; Peng W; Wang M; Yue B; Chen X; Wang J; Shu S; Fu C; Zhong J; Cai X Anim Biotechnol; 2023 Dec; 34(8):3978-3987. PubMed ID: 37593948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards the discovery of goat meat quality biomarkers using label-free proteomics. Lamri M; Della Malva A; Djenane D; López-Pedrouso M; Franco D; Albenzio M; Lorenzo JM; Gagaoua M J Proteomics; 2023 Apr; 278():104868. PubMed ID: 36871648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shotgun proteomics for the preliminary identification of biomarkers of beef sensory tenderness, juiciness and chewiness from plasma and muscle of young Limousin-sired bulls. Zhu Y; Gagaoua M; Mullen AM; Viala D; Rai DK; Kelly AL; Sheehan D; Hamill RM Meat Sci; 2021 Jun; 176():108488. PubMed ID: 33714802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular signatures of beef tenderness: Underlying mechanisms based on integromics of protein biomarkers from multi-platform proteomics studies. Gagaoua M; Terlouw EMC; Mullen AM; Franco D; Warner RD; Lorenzo JM; Purslow PP; Gerrard D; Hopkins DL; Troy D; Picard B Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108311. PubMed ID: 33002652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of oxidative damage to proteins on meat tenderness using a proteomics approach. Malheiros JM; Braga CP; Grove RA; Ribeiro FA; Calkins CR; Adamec J; Chardulo LAL Meat Sci; 2019 Feb; 148():64-71. PubMed ID: 30317011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insights on meat quality from combining traditional studies and proteomics. Purslow PP; Gagaoua M; Warner RD Meat Sci; 2021 Apr; 174():108423. PubMed ID: 33422773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of biomarkers for beef meat qualities using a combination of Parallel Reaction Monitoring- and antibody-based proteomics. Bonnet M; Soulat J; Bons J; Léger S; De Koning L; Carapito C; Picard B Food Chem; 2020 Jul; 317():126376. PubMed ID: 32078991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of proteome changes on the tenderness of yak rumen smooth muscle during postmortem storage based on the label-free mass spectrometry. Li S; Yu Q; Han L; Zhang Y; Tian X; Zhao S Food Res Int; 2019 Feb; 116():1336-1343. PubMed ID: 30716923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proteomic and parallel reaction monitoring approaches to evaluate biomarkers of mutton tenderness. Zheng K; Yin Y; Cao Y; Guo L; Li P; Jiang J; Huang X; Jiang Y; Wu J Food Chem; 2022 Dec; 397():133746. PubMed ID: 35882166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative proteomic analysis of cattle-yak and yak longissimus thoracis provides insights into the differential mechanisms of meat quality. Chang X; Xu Y; Cheng L; Yi K; Gu X; Luo Z; Zhang J; Wang J; Geng F Food Res Int; 2023 Nov; 173(Pt 1):113253. PubMed ID: 37803567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]