These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34883040)

  • 1. Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference.
    Saleh HK; Folkeard P; Van Eeckhoutte M; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 61(12):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 34883040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; DeVries S; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid.
    Cho YS; Park SY; Seol HY; Lim JH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jun; 145(6):516-522. PubMed ID: 31095263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e224-37. PubMed ID: 26881981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level on New Hearing Aid Users.
    Hausladen J; Plyler PN; Clausen B; Fincher A; Norris S; Russell T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar; 33(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 34670289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.
    Johnson JA; Xu J; Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 27556363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of advanced hearing aid technology on speech understanding for older listeners with mild to moderate, adult-onset, sensorineural hearing loss.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Gerontology; 2014; 60(6):557-68. PubMed ID: 25139516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefit on daily listening with technological advancements: comparison of basic and premium category hearing aids.
    Prakash P; Sreedhar A; Balan JR; Varghese AM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 279(6):3179-3187. PubMed ID: 35038028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
    Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection, Speech Recognition, Loudness, and Preference Outcomes With a Direct Drive Hearing Aid: Effects of Bandwidth.
    Folkeard P; Eeckhoutte MV; Levy S; Dundas D; Abbasalipour P; Glista D; Agrawal S; Scollie S
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521999139. PubMed ID: 33874803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-Level Speech Recognition of Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Battles J; Neumann S; Manning J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):196-205. PubMed ID: 34758503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musician and Nonmusician Hearing Aid Setting Preferences for Music and Speech Stimuli.
    D'Onofrio KL; Gifford RH; Ricketts TA
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 28(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 31091118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.