These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34883040)

  • 21. Musician and Nonmusician Hearing Aid Setting Preferences for Music and Speech Stimuli.
    D'Onofrio KL; Gifford RH; Ricketts TA
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 28(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 31091118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal levels.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):515-27. PubMed ID: 22031676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 9058034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
    Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level and Individual Characteristics on Listener Outcome Measures.
    Plyler PN; Hausladen J; Capps M; Cox MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3317-3329. PubMed ID: 34256006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments.
    Brody L; Wu YH; Stangl E
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 30458521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech recognition, loudness, and preference with extended bandwidth hearing aids for adult hearing aid users.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Folkeard P; Glista D; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):780-791. PubMed ID: 32309996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bilateral versus unilateral hearing aids for bilateral hearing impairment in adults.
    Schilder AG; Chong LY; Ftouh S; Burton MJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD012665. PubMed ID: 29256573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Effects of Extended Input Dynamic Range on Laboratory and Field-Trial Evaluations in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Easterday M; Behrens T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):634-648. PubMed ID: 30403956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid.
    Arlinger S; Billermark E; Oberg M; Lunner T; Hellgren J
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 9505292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perception of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Individuals with Late-Onset Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    Mathai JP; Appu S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):815-23. PubMed ID: 26554487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
    Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
    Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms--user preference and performance.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):373-87. PubMed ID: 9360861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition.
    Rallapalli V; Ellis G; Souza P
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of hearing aid release time and presentation level on speech perception in noise in elderly individuals with hearing loss.
    Pottackal Mathai J; Mohammed H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 274(2):671-677. PubMed ID: 27571783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hickson L
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520933392. PubMed ID: 32602407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.