301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34883366)
1. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
Garadat SN; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neurotrophin Gene Therapy in Deafened Ears with Cochlear Implants: Long-term Effects on Nerve Survival and Functional Measures.
Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Hughes AP; Strahl SB; Sinan M; Raphael Y
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 18(6):731-750. PubMed ID: 28776202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
Kang SY; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Su GL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):245-65. PubMed ID: 19902297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes over time in the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap (IPG) effect following cochlear implantation in Guinea pigs.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Colesa DJ; Buswinka CJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107809. PubMed ID: 31630082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiological Estimates of the Electrode-Neuron Interface Differ Between Younger and Older Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Jahn KN; Arenberg JG
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):948-960. PubMed ID: 32032228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing.
Pfingst BE; Bowling SA; Colesa DJ; Garadat SN; Raphael Y; Shibata SB; Strahl SB; Su GL; Zhou N
Hear Res; 2011 Nov; 281(1-2):65-73. PubMed ID: 21605648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Late electrically-evoked compound action potentials as markers for acute micro-lesions of spiral ganglion neurons.
Konerding W; Arenberg JG; Kral A; Baumhoff P
Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 413():108057. PubMed ID: 32883545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.
Tanaka C; Nguyen-Huynh A; Loera K; Stark G; Reiss L
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():82-93. PubMed ID: 25128626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses.
Miller AL; Smith DW; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10491953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of monopolar and bipolar electric stimulation on survival and size of human spiral ganglion cells as studied by postmortem histopathology.
Seyyedi M; Eddington DK; Nadol JB
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():9-16. PubMed ID: 23660399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation.
Nadol JB
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):220-8. PubMed ID: 9334769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.
Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Hembrador S; Kang SY; Middlebrooks JC; Raphael Y; Su GL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3954-68. PubMed ID: 22225050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a chronically-implanted mouse model for studies of cochlear health and implant function.
Colesa DJ; Devare J; Swiderski DL; Beyer LA; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2021 May; 404():108216. PubMed ID: 33691255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
