162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34884244)
1. Geometric Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Oral Implant Planning Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Schwindling FS; Boehm S; Herpel C; Kronsteiner D; Vogel L; Juerchott A; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Rammelsberg P; Hilgenfeld T
J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(23):. PubMed ID: 34884244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of dental MRI for radiation-free guided dental implant planning: a prospective, in vivo study of accuracy and reliability.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Jende JME; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6392-6401. PubMed ID: 32960331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional accuracy of partially guided implant surgery based on dental magnetic resonance imaging.
Schwindling FS; Juerchott A; Boehm S; Rues S; Kronsteiner D; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Rammelsberg P; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Oct; 32(10):1218-1227. PubMed ID: 34352147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-derived virtual 3-dimensional bone surface models of the mandible in comparison to computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: A porcine cadaver study.
Probst FA; Burian E; Malenova Y; Lyutskanova P; Stumbaum MJ; Ritschl LM; Kronthaler S; Karampinos D; Probst M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 23(5):779-788. PubMed ID: 34318580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1.5 T MRI with a Dedicated Dental Signal-Amplification Coil as Noninvasive, Radiation-Free Alternative to CBCT in Presurgical Implant Planning Procedures.
Grandoch A; Peterke N; Hokamp NG; Zöller JE; Lichenstein T; Neugebauer J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(6):1211-1218. PubMed ID: 34919623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo accuracy of tooth surface reconstruction based on CBCT and dental MRI-A clinical pilot study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Weber D; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):920-927. PubMed ID: 31257638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and accuracy of intraoral radiography, cone beam CT, and dental MRI for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions at zirconia implants - an ex vivo feasibility study.
Miotk N; Schwindling FS; Zidan M; Juerchott A; Rammelsberg P; Hosseini Z; Nittka M; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Hilgenfeld T
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104422. PubMed ID: 36649822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra-oral scan registration for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis.
Hamilton A; Singh A; Friedland B; Jamjoom FZ; Griseto N; Gallucci GO
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Dec; 33(12):1273-1281. PubMed ID: 36239539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does cone-beam CT alter treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative implant planning using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.
Guerrero ME; Noriega J; Castro C; Jacobs R
Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Jun; 44(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 24944961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fully guided implant surgery using Magnetic Resonance Imaging - An in vitro study on accuracy in human mandibles.
Flügge T; Ludwig U; Winter G; Amrein P; Kernen F; Nelson K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Aug; 31(8):737-746. PubMed ID: 32459868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Registration accuracy of three-dimensional surface and cone beam computed tomography data for virtual implant planning.
Ritter L; Reiz SD; Rothamel D; Dreiseidler T; Karapetian V; Scheer M; Zöller JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 21488966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of 2D vs 3D imaging and professional experience on dental implant treatment planning.
Fortes JH; de Oliveira-Santos C; Matsumoto W; da Motta RJG; Tirapelli C
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):929-936. PubMed ID: 29907931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictability and image quality of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography in computer-guided implantology: An experimental study.
Horsch L; Labis C; Trebing CT; Kronsteiner D; Hilgenfeld T; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103744. PubMed ID: 34252488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental MRI: a road beyond CBCT.
Nakamura T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6389-6391. PubMed ID: 32997171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
