These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3488645)
1. The status of MRI in 1986: rates of adoption in the United States and worldwide. Steinberg EP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Sep; 147(3):453-5. PubMed ID: 3488645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diffusion of MRI: patterns of siting and ownership in an era of changing incentives. Hillman AL; Schwartz JS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 May; 146(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 3485912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imagers. Diffusion patterns and policy issues. Steinberg EP; Sisk JE; Locke KE N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(14):859-64. PubMed ID: 3897866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Newer manufacturers peg hopes on unproven NMR scanner over CT. Kuntz EF Mod Healthc; 1982 Jan; 12(1):70, 72. PubMed ID: 10254265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments. Ginde AA; Foianini A; Renner DM; Valley M; Camargo CA Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Aug; 15(8):780-3. PubMed ID: 18783491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion of an innovation: adoption of CT scanners. Phillips ML; Durick DA Radiol Technol; 1985; 57(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 4070612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines. Blachar A; Tal S; Mandel A; Novikov I; Polliack G; Sosna J; Freedman Y; Copel L; Shemer J J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):851-9. PubMed ID: 17412184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diffusion of MRI in the United States: what is fact and what is speculation. Evens RG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Oct; 147(4):856-7. PubMed ID: 3489398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Government health policy and the diffusion of new medical devices. Hillman BJ Health Serv Res; 1986 Dec; 21(5):681-711. PubMed ID: 3818311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI: update on technology diffusion and acquisition. Hoppszallern S; Hughes C; Zimmerman RA Hosp Technol Ser; 1991 Apr; 10(8):1-32. PubMed ID: 10110923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging professionals' beliefs on overutilization of CT and MRI exams. Gonzales JM Radiol Manage; 2011; 33(6):41-6. PubMed ID: 22235740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The forces driving MRI. The manufacturers' role. Tsuchiyama S Adm Radiol; 1987 Apr; 6(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 10282513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic and utilization analysis of magnetic resonance imaging units in the United States in 1985. Evens RG; Jost RG; Evens RG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Aug; 145(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 3875241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reaction to: "Demand Forecasting for MRI Services". Di Monda R Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 10270715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of CT and MRI scanning among cancer patients in Ontario. Coburn N; Przybysz R; Barbera L; Hodgson DC; Laupacis A; Law C Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 21724124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Installation and operation of NMR-CT]. Matsuzawa T; Yamaura H Nihon Rinsho; 1983 Jul; 41(7):1551-64. PubMed ID: 6632249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value. Baker LC; Atlas SW; Afendulis CC Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(6):1467-78. PubMed ID: 18997202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technology pioneers give progress report on MRI installation. Christensen B Hospitals; 1984 May; 58(10):44, 46. PubMed ID: 6714952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]