138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34887683)
1. Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Primary Incisors Restored with Different Intracanal-Reinforcement Materials.
Salama F; Abdelmegid F; Alhussain M; Muaddi H; AlMaflehi N; Alhowaish L
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2021; 13():507-512. PubMed ID: 34887683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study.
Al-Nahedh HN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 34267000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite.
Atalay C; Yazici AR; Horuztepe A; Nagas E; Ertan A; Ozgunaltay G
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(5):E131-E140. PubMed ID: 27352045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Fracture Resistance of Restored Premolars with Novel Composite Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Al-Ibraheemi ZA; Abdullah HA; Jawad NA; Haider J
Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():5512708. PubMed ID: 34462637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of pulpotomized and composite-restored primary molars: Incremental versus bulk-fill techniques.
Ghajari MF; Ghasemi A; Moradi AY; Sanjari K
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2020; 17(6):412-416. PubMed ID: 33889345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture Resistance and Marginal Adaptation of Capped and Uncapped Bulk-fill Resin-based Materials.
Al-Nahedh HN; Alawami Z
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):E43-E56. PubMed ID: 31750801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with a transilluminating post and adhesive restorative materials.
Goncalves LA; Vansan LP; Paulino SM; Sousa Neto MD
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 17098497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
Solomon CS; Osman YI
SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with Zirconia filler containing composite core material and fiber posts.
Jeaidi ZA
Pak J Med Sci; 2016; 32(6):1474-1478. PubMed ID: 28083048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthetic posts.
Maccari PC; Conceição EN; Nunes MF
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(1):25-30; discussion 31. PubMed ID: 12638770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored using three root-reinforcement methods.
Moosavi H; Maleknejad F; Kimyai S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jan; 9(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18176646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Vitro Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post and Core Systems.
Alamdari Mahd M; Moeiny P; Heshmat H; Askarizadeh N
Int J Dent; 2023; 2023():2895892. PubMed ID: 37152478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Remineralizing Agents on Bond Strength of Resin-Composites to Primary Enamel.
Abdelmegid FY; Salama FS; Abouobaid EI; Halawany HS; Alhadlaq MK
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(5):331-336. PubMed ID: 31560592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
Schmitter M; Lippenberger S; Rues S; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth.
Balkaya MC; Birdal IS
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):296-303. PubMed ID: 23684279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
