These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34888558)

  • 41. From collision to collaboration - Integrating informal recyclers and re-use operators in Europe: A review.
    Scheinberg A; Nesić J; Savain R; Luppi P; Sinnott P; Petean F; Pop F
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):820-39. PubMed ID: 27449318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Towards a circular economy: Development of a support tool for designing reverse logistics systems.
    Mallick PK; Salling KB; Pigosso DCA; McAloone TC
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 351():119819. PubMed ID: 38104465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Approaching a zero-waste strategy by reuse in New York City: Challenges and potential.
    Lugo M; Ail SS; Castaldi MJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jul; 38(7):734-744. PubMed ID: 32372709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Managing plastic packaging waste in emerging economies: The case of EPR in India.
    Pani SK; Pathak AA
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 288():112405. PubMed ID: 33780821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Examining the concept of convenient collection: an application to extended producer responsibility and product stewardship frameworks.
    Wagner TP
    Waste Manag; 2013 Mar; 33(3):499-507. PubMed ID: 22818910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. EPR policies for electronics in developing Asia: an adapted phase-in approach.
    Akenji L; Hotta Y; Bengtsson M; Hayashi S
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Sep; 29(9):919-30. PubMed ID: 21730041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A review of various strategies in e-waste management in line with circular economics.
    Pouyamanesh S; Kowsari E; Ramakrishna S; Chinnappan A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(41):93462-93490. PubMed ID: 37572248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. 4R of rubber waste management: current and outlook.
    Leong SY; Lee SY; Koh TY; Ang DT
    J Mater Cycles Waste Manag; 2023; 25(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 36466440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Beyond the throwaway society: A life cycle-based assessment of the environmental benefit of reuse.
    Castellani V; Sala S; Mirabella N
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jul; 11(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 25557152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. New York City's Reuse Impact Calculator: Quantifying the zero waste impact of materials reuse.
    Fortuna LM; Castaldi MJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Dec; 36(12):1190-1200. PubMed ID: 30336738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reuse assessment of WEEE: Systematic review of emerging themes and research directions.
    Anandh G; PrasannaVenkatesan S; Goh M; Mathiyazhagan K
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112335. PubMed ID: 33761368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Extended producer responsibility for consumer waste: the gap between economic theory and implementation.
    Dubois M
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):36-42. PubMed ID: 22993134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clarifying the disagreements on various reuse options: Repair, recondition, refurbish and remanufacture.
    Gharfalkar M; Ali Z; Hillier G
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Oct; 34(10):995-1005. PubMed ID: 26917561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A management system for end-of-life tyres: a Portuguese case study.
    Ferrão P; Ribeiro P; Silva P
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 17482804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of economic instruments for countries with low municipal waste management performance: An approach based on the analytic hierarchy process.
    Kling M; Seyring N; Tzanova P
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):912-22. PubMed ID: 27121417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity?
    Andersen T; Halse LL
    Circ Econ Sustain; 2023 Feb; ():1-22. PubMed ID: 36844893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The evolution of the Italian EPR system for the management of household Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Technical and economic performance in the spotlight.
    Favot M; Veit R; Massarutto A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():431-7. PubMed ID: 27329553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Market-based tools for a plastic waste reduction policy in agriculture: A case study in the south of Italy.
    De Lucia C; Pazienza P
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 250():109468. PubMed ID: 31505381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Behavioral game and simulation analysis of extended producer responsibility system's implementation under environmental regulations.
    Peng B; Wang Y; Elahi E; Wei G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(17):17644-17654. PubMed ID: 31028619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.