These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34888606)

  • 1. [Consistency of the landmark identification on two types of cephalograms from cone-beam CT].
    Ma XQ; Zhao N; Dong X; Qian WH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Oct; 30(5):522-525. PubMed ID: 34888606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
    Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow J; Soares Cevidanes LH; Mol A
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 18298214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalogram synthesis and landmark detection in dental cone-beam CT systems.
    Huang Y; Fan F; Syben C; Roser P; Mill L; Maier A
    Med Image Anal; 2021 May; 70():102028. PubMed ID: 33744833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.
    Shokri A; Miresmaeili A; Farhadian N; Falah-Kooshki S; Amini P; Mollaie N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160180. PubMed ID: 28306330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
    Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning.
    Zhang W; Skrypczak A; Weltman R
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():65. PubMed ID: 26059796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between full face and hemifacial CBCT cephalograms in clinically symmetrical patients: a pilot study.
    Junqueira CH; Janson G; Junqueira MH; Mendes LM; Favilla EE; Garib DG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 25992992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Na ER; Aljawad H; Lee KM; Hwang HS
    Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30603624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of automatic cephalometric landmark identification using artificial intelligence.
    Bulatova G; Kusnoto B; Grace V; Tsay TP; Avenetti DM; Sanchez FJC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():37-42. PubMed ID: 34842346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Lamichane M; Anderson NK; Rigali PH; Seldin EB; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19651340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.
    Delamare EL; Liedke GS; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira HL; Ribeiro JL; Silveira HE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):414-23. PubMed ID: 20841459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.