333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34889687)
1. Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Chang ES; Le AH; Looney AM; Colantonio DF; Roach WB; Helgeson MD; Clark DM; Fredericks DR; Nagda SH
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Apr; 50(5):1375-1381. PubMed ID: 34889687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing.
Bodendorfer BM; Looney AM; Lipkin SL; Nolton EC; Li J; Najarian RG; Chang ES
Am J Sports Med; 2018 Dec; 46(14):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 30403369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Tunnel Position in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Dutton PH; Banffy MB; Nelson TJ; Metzger MF
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Dec; 47(14):3491-3497. PubMed ID: 31647881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique and the Docking Technique for Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Meyers KN; Middleton KK; Fu MC; Dines JS
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 50(4):1061-1065. PubMed ID: 35188812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.
Itami Y; Mihata T; McGarry MH; Lin CC; Patel NA; Kantor AH; Hasegawa A; Neo M; Lee TQ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1477-1486. PubMed ID: 33276162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation.
Narvaez MV; Nelson TJ; Youssefzadeh K; Limpisvasti O; Metzger MF
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Jul; 50(9):2508-2514. PubMed ID: 35722811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of the TightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique: kinematic and failure testing.
Lynch JL; Maerz T; Kurdziel MD; Davidson AA; Baker KC; Anderson K
Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 23636555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using bisuspensory fixation: a biomechanical comparison with the docking technique.
Jackson TJ; Adamson GJ; Peterson A; Patton J; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1158-64. PubMed ID: 23548807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique to the Docking Technique.
Camp CL; Bernard C; Benavitz B; Konicek J; Altchek DW; Dines JS
Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Jul; 7(7):2325967119857592. PubMed ID: 31763343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of graft fixation at 30° and 90° of elbow flexion for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction by the docking technique.
Cohen SB; Woods DP; Siegler S; Dodson CC; Namani R; Ciccotti MG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Feb; 24(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 25577730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Modified Docking Technique With and Without Suture Augmentation.
Leasure J; Reynolds K; Thorne M; Escamilla R; Akizuki K
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(4):928-932. PubMed ID: 30689955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Middle and Distal Aspects of the Ulnar Footprint of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow Do Not Provide Significant Resistance to Valgus Stress: A Biomechanical Study.
Erickson BJ; Fu M; Meyers K; Camp CL; Altchek DW; Coleman SH; Dines JS
Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Feb; 7(2):2325967118825294. PubMed ID: 30800692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of 2 techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow.
Paletta GA; Klepps SJ; Difelice GS; Allen T; Brodt MD; Burns ME; Silva MJ; Wright RW
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1599-603. PubMed ID: 16861581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with and without an internal brace.
Bernholt DL; Lake SP; Castile RM; Papangelou C; Hauck O; Smith MV
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Nov; 28(11):2247-2252. PubMed ID: 31351903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Structural Bioinductive Scaffold: A Biomechanical Study.
Lin KM; Brinson K; Atzmon R; Chan CK; Sherman SL; Safran MR; Freehill MT
Am J Sports Med; 2024 May; 52(6):1483-1490. PubMed ID: 38650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A biomechanical evaluation of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a novel technique for ulnar-sided fixation.
Morgan RJ; Starman JS; Habet NA; Peindl RD; Bankston LS; D'Alessandro DD; Connor PM; Fleischli JE
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jul; 38(7):1448-55. PubMed ID: 20442324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Establishing Safe Extra-articular Parameters for Cortical Button Distal Fixation During Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Hooper PO; Warren J; Silko C; Frangiamore SJ; King D; Farrow LD; Schickendantz MS
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Sep; 47(11):2699-2703. PubMed ID: 31386563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Effect of Differential Tensioning on Suture-Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow.
Iannucci LE; Koscso JM; Castile RM; Lake SP; Smith MV
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Jan; 51(1):205-213. PubMed ID: 36412519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical Stability of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair of the Elbow: The Role of Ligament Bracing on Gap Formation and Stabilization.
Bachmaier S; Wijdicks CA; Verma NN; Higgins LD; Greiner S
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Apr; 51(5):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 36876745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanical comparison of 2 hybrid techniques for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.
Chronister JE; Morris RP; Andersen CR; Buford WL; Bennett JM; Mehlhoff TL
J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 39(10):2033-40. PubMed ID: 25194771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
