These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34889831)

  • 1. Crash Performance of Rear-facing Restraints With a Fracture Type Spica Casted 1-Year-Old Dummy.
    Collins A; McKean L; Ostrander J; Nagarajan S; Atkinson P; Atkinson T
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2022 Jan; 42(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 34889831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safe transport of spica casted infants: Reducing the risk of traumatic injury in side impact collisions.
    Collins AC; Adams N; Ostrander JD; Atkinson P; Atkinson TS
    Am J Surg; 2022 Jan; 223(1):164-169. PubMed ID: 34538481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frontal Crash Injury Metrics Are Below Mandated Limits for a Spica Casted Child Dummy in Currently Available Restraints.
    Collins AC; Caskey S; Peck JB; Walter N; Atkinson TS; Atkinson PJ
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2020; 40(5):e394-e400. PubMed ID: 31770168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Casting technique and restraint choice influence child safety during transport of body casted children subjected to a simulated frontal MVA.
    Zielinski J; Oliver G; Sybesma J; Walter N; Atkinson P
    J Trauma; 2009 Jun; 66(6):1653-65. PubMed ID: 19509628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Injury metrics are altered in spica-casted versus non-casted child ATDs in side-impact collisions with door intrusion.
    Mead M; Caskey S; Walter N; Atkinson P; Atkinson T; Collins AC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(6):341-346. PubMed ID: 32401560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responses of the scaled pediatric human body model in the rear- and forward-facing child seats in simulated frontal motor vehicle crashes.
    Belwadi A; Sarfare S; Tushak S; Maheshwari J; Menon S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S143-S144. PubMed ID: 31725355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crash analysis of lower extremity injuries in children restrained in forward-facing car seats during front and rear impacts.
    Bennett TD; Kaufman R; Schiff M; Mock C; Quan L
    J Trauma; 2006 Sep; 61(3):592-7. PubMed ID: 16966993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Head excursion in frontal impacts is lower in high back booster seats than in forward facing child seats with internal harnesses designed for children up to 8 years of age.
    Bilston LE; Mills E; Kent N; Brown J; Whyte T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(5):244-249. PubMed ID: 35333678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
    Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Head impact contact points for restrained child occupants.
    Arbogast KB; Wozniak S; Locey CM; Maltese MR; Zonfrillo MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 22458796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
    Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safe Transportation in-Spica Following Surgical Treatment of Infantile DDH: Solutions and Threats.
    Adams AJ; Johnson MA; Ryan KA; Farrell SB; Morro M; Sankar WN
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2019 Aug; 39(7):e488-e493. PubMed ID: 30608303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods to mitigate injury to toddlers in near-side impact crashes.
    Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Nov; 40(6):1880-92. PubMed ID: 19068290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis of pediatric injuries and child restraint system.
    Kumar S; Harcourt J; Herbst B; Strickland D
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2012; 48():232-8. PubMed ID: 22846288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of seat properties on occupant dynamics in severe rear crashes.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):324-36. PubMed ID: 14630581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thoracic and lumbar spine responses in high-speed rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 29494309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate head injury threshold measures for various sized children seated behind vehicle seats in rear impacts.
    Saczalski K; Sances A; Kumaresan S; Pozzi M; Saczalski T; Burton JL; Lewis P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():381-6. PubMed ID: 15133988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.