These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34889839)

  • 1. Outcomes in Patients Meeting Cochlear Implant Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet.
    Thai A; Tran E; Swanson A; Fitzgerald MB; Blevins NH; Ma Y; Smith ML; Larky JB; Alyono JC
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 34889839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear Implant Qualification in Noise Versus Quiet: Do Patients Demonstrate Similar Postoperative Benefits?
    Schauwecker N; Patro A; Holder JT; Bennett ML; Perkins E; Moberly AC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 May; 170(5):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 38353294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Older Individuals Meeting Medicare Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet: Are These Patients Improved by Surgery?
    Mudery JA; Francis R; McCrary H; Jacob A
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 27832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Patients Benefit From a Cochlear Implant When They Qualify Only in the Presence of Background Noise?
    Lundberg EMH; Strong D; Anderson M; Kaizer AM; Gubbels S
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Feb; 42(2):251-259. PubMed ID: 33229878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of a Hearing Registry: Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Quiet Versus Noise in 1,611 Patients.
    Dunn C; Miller SE; Schafer EC; Silva C; Gifford RH; Grisel JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):851-861. PubMed ID: 32966101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Further Evidence for Individual Ear Consideration in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation.
    Patro A; Lindquist NR; Holder JT; Tawfik KO; O'Malley MR; Bennett ML; Haynes DS; Gifford R; Perkins EL
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Oct; 43(9):1033-1040. PubMed ID: 36075098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Speech Test Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Patients With and Without Asymmetric Hearing Loss.
    Misztal C; Peña S; Martinez D; Velandia S; Goncalves S; Ma R; Holcomb M; Angeli S; Telischi F; Dinh CT
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jun; 43(5):559-566. PubMed ID: 35261377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Age on Noise Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Shew MA; Herzog JA; Kallogjeri D; Chen S; Wick C; Durakovic N; McJunkin J; Buchman CA;
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 34889840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
    Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria.
    Perkins E; Dietrich MS; Manzoor N; O'Malley M; Bennett M; Rivas A; Haynes D; Labadie R; Gifford R
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jul; 42(6):815-823. PubMed ID: 33606469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear Implant Performance in Candidates With Moderate Hearing Loss Qualifying in Noise.
    Friedland DR; Kozlowski K; Runge CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10):1484-1491. PubMed ID: 34310553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Espahbodi M; Harvey E; Livingston AJ; Montagne W; Kozlowski K; Jensen J; Liu X; Juan W; Tarima S; Rusch M; Harris MS
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep; 43(8):e888-e894. PubMed ID: 35970167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation Between Quality of Life and Speech Recognition Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation.
    Dorismond C; Patro A; Holder JT; Perkins EL
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Dec; 44(10):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 37832582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual Patient Comorbidities and Effect on Cochlear Implant Performance.
    Dang S; Kallogjeri D; Dizdar K; Lee D; Bao JW; Varghese J; Walia A; Zhan K; Youssef S; Durakovic N; Wick CC; Herzog JA; Buchman CA; Piccirillo JF; Shew MA
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Apr; 45(4):e281-e288. PubMed ID: 38437816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive Ability of First-Side Cochlear Implant Performance in Adult Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.
    Quimby AE; Wen CZ; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ; Brant JA
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 36624591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
    Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
    Buchman CA; Herzog JA; McJunkin JL; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Firszt JB; Kallogjeri D;
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):916-924. PubMed ID: 32857113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Slim Straight and Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.
    MacPhail ME; Connell NT; Totten DJ; Gray MT; Pisoni D; Yates CW; Nelson RF
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 May; 166(5):943-950. PubMed ID: 34399646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation.
    Dornhoffer JR; Reddy P; Meyer TA; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 33410869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.