171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34890023)
1. Robotic Techniques in Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: An Assessment of Short- and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes.
Kamarajah SK; Griffiths EA; Phillips AW; Ruurda J; van Hillegersberg R; Hofstetter WL; Markar SR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2812-2825. PubMed ID: 34890023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
Byiringiro I; Aurit SJ; Nandipati KC
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):4018-4027. PubMed ID: 36097100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Berlth F; Poplawski A; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Müller-Stich BP; Ruurda JP; Schiesser M; Schneider PM; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1060. PubMed ID: 34565343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
Weksler B; Sullivan JL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Survival comparison of Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction between transthoracic and transabdominal approaches:a joint data analysis of thoracic and gastrointestinal surgery].
Yang S; Yuan Y; Hu H; Li R; Liu K; Zhang W; Yang K; Yang Y; Bai D; Chen X; Zhou Z; Chen L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):132-142. PubMed ID: 30799535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy provides superior surgical resection.
Ali AM; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Perry Y; Linden PA; Towe CW
Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6329-6334. PubMed ID: 33174098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.
Greenleaf EK; Sun SX; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Mar; 20(2):368-378. PubMed ID: 26961133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of robotic esophagectomies for esophageal cancer by hospital volume: an analysis of the national cancer database.
Hue JJ; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Linden PA; Towe CW
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3802-3810. PubMed ID: 32789587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.
Sarkaria IS; Rizk NP; Goldman DA; Sima C; Tan KS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Molena D; Bott M; Atkinson T; Jones DR; Rusch VW
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 108(3):920-928. PubMed ID: 31026433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP database analysis.
Harbison GJ; Vossler JD; Yim NH; Murayama KM
Am J Surg; 2019 Dec; 218(6):1223-1228. PubMed ID: 31500797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
Facer B; Wang F; Grijalva CG; Alvarez RD; Shu XO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 31715149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Hospital Volume on Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer.
Dougherty K; Zhang Z; Montenegro G; Hinyard L; Xu E; Hsueh E; Luu C
Am Surg; 2023 Nov; 89(11):4569-4577. PubMed ID: 35999671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
