155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34890138)
21. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
Grant AJ; Burgess S
Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of the instrumental inequalities in simulated mendelian randomization analyses with coarsened exposures.
Diemer EW; Shi J; Hernan MA; Swanson SA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 38819552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Causal inference on neuroimaging data with Mendelian randomisation.
Taschler B; Smith SM; Nichols TE
Neuroimage; 2022 Sep; 258():119385. PubMed ID: 35714886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Association of maternal circulating 25(OH)D and calcium with birth weight: A mendelian randomisation analysis.
Thompson WD; Tyrrell J; Borges MC; Beaumont RN; Knight BA; Wood AR; Ring SM; Hattersley AT; Freathy RM; Lawlor DA
PLoS Med; 2019 Jun; 16(6):e1002828. PubMed ID: 31211782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.
Bucur IG; Claassen T; Heskes T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1081-1111. PubMed ID: 31146640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings.
Sanderson E; Davey Smith G; Windmeijer F; Bowden J
Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 48(3):713-727. PubMed ID: 30535378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sparse dimensionality reduction approaches in Mendelian randomisation with highly correlated exposures.
Karageorgiou V; Gill D; Bowden J; Zuber V
Elife; 2023 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 37074034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Beyond Mendelian randomization: how to interpret evidence of shared genetic predictors.
Burgess S; Butterworth AS; Thompson JR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():208-16. PubMed ID: 26291580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Causal relationships between migraine and microstructural white matter: a Mendelian randomization study.
Zhao L; Zhao W; ; Cao J; Tu Y
J Headache Pain; 2023 Feb; 24(1):10. PubMed ID: 36793015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A data-adaptive method for investigating effect heterogeneity with high-dimensional covariates in Mendelian randomization.
Tian H; Tom BDM; Burgess S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):34. PubMed ID: 38341532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factorial Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants to assess interactions.
Rees JMB; Foley CN; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1147-1158. PubMed ID: 31369124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mendelian randomization with incomplete measurements on the exposure in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.
Li Y; Wong KY; Howard AG; Gordon-Larsen P; Highland HM; Graff M; North KE; Downie CG; Avery CL; Yu B; Young KL; Buchanan VL; Kaplan R; Hou L; Joyce BT; Qi Q; Sofer T; Moon JY; Lin DY
HGG Adv; 2024 Jan; 5(1):100245. PubMed ID: 37817410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis.
Wan B; Ma N; Lu W
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15087. PubMed ID: 36967997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Causal relationship between blood metabolites and risk of five infections: a Mendelian randomization study.
Wei Z; Xiong Q; Huang D; Wu Z; Chen Z
BMC Infect Dis; 2023 Oct; 23(1):663. PubMed ID: 37805474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing causal relationships using genetic proxies for exposures: an introduction to Mendelian randomization.
Katikireddi SV; Green MJ; Taylor AE; Davey Smith G; Munafò MR
Addiction; 2018 Apr; 113(4):764-774. PubMed ID: 28921935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Application of mendelian randomization methods in causal inference of observational study].
Lin LJ; Wei YY; Zhang RY; Chen F
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 53(6):619-624. PubMed ID: 31177761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
