152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34890593)
1. Evaluation of Cone-beam Computed Tomography Artifacts Produced by Metal Objects Located Within and Outside the Field of View.
Kassabji A; Tahmasbi M; Augsburger RA; Nair M; Kesterke MJ; Jalali P
J Endod; 2022 Feb; 48(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 34890593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artifacts caused by titanium implants in CBCT images of the mandible: an experimental study.
Fardim KAC; Machado AH; Assis NMSP; Sotto-Maior BS; Mauad LQ; Devito KL
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 34978995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CBCT image artefacts generated by implants located inside the field of view or in the exomass.
Demirturk Kocasarac H; Koenig LJ; Ustaoglu G; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Feb; 51(2):20210092. PubMed ID: 34289314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distribution of metal artifacts arising from the exomass in small field-of-view cone beam computed tomography scans.
Candemil AP; Salmon B; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Jul; 130(1):116-125. PubMed ID: 32057753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different cone beam computed tomography settings on artifact production in titanium and zirconia dental implants: An in vitro study.
Kuzu TE; Kiş HC
Dent Med Probl; 2024; 61(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 38686966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of scan mode (partial/full rotations) and FOV size in the formation of artefacts in cone beam CT.
Costa EDD; Queiroz PM; Santaella GM; Capelozza ALA; Ambrosano GMB; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 May; 48(4):20180340. PubMed ID: 30563362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of metal artefacts on subjective perception of image quality of 13 CBCT devices.
Wanderley VA; Leite AF; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Pauwels R; Müller-García F; Becker K; Oliveira ML; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4457-4466. PubMed ID: 35166942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of an auto-edge counting method for quantification of metal artifacts in CBCT images: a multivariate analysis of object position, field of view size, tube voltage, and metal artifact reduction algorithm.
Khosravifard A; Saberi BV; Khosravifard N; Motallebi S; Kajan ZD; Ghaffari ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Dec; 132(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 33975812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?
Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Fontenele RC; Oliveira-Santos N; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5281-5291. PubMed ID: 33625608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-density objects in exomass affect the volume of high-density objects inside the field of view.
Coelho-Silva F; Cascante-Sequeira D; Réa MT; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Feb; 53(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 38224272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views.
Codari M; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo L; Haiter Neto F; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1509-1514. PubMed ID: 28432698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.
Pauwels R; Pittayapat P; Sinpitaksakul P; Panmekiate S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20200597. PubMed ID: 33882256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images.
Pauwels R; Stamatakis H; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Horner K; Tsiklakis K;
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():94-9. PubMed ID: 22168574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement Accuracy in Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Presence of Metal Artifact.
Ismail A; Lakschevitz F; MacDonald D; Ford NL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):143-152. PubMed ID: 35235633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: impact on image quality.
Fontenele RC; Nascimento EH; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(6):20180021. PubMed ID: 29668300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the shape of the field-of-view influence the magnitude of artefacts from high-density materials in cone-beam computed tomography?
Cascante-Sequeira D; Fontenele RC; Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Oct; 52(7):20230147. PubMed ID: 37493606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are metal artefact reduction algorithms effective to correct cone beam CT artefacts arising from the exomass?
Candemil AP; Salmon B; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GMB; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180290. PubMed ID: 30540919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the Field of View Size on CBCT Artifacts Caused by the Presence of Metal Objects in the Exomass.
Safi Y; Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M; Jafarian Amiri M
Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():2071108. PubMed ID: 36117513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of artifacts generated by zirconium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images.
Vasconcelos TV; Bechara BB; McMahan CA; Freitas DQ; Noujeim M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Feb; 123(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 28086998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
