These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34890593)

  • 21. Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities.
    Shokri A; Jamalpour MR; Khavid A; Mohseni Z; Sadeghi M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Apr; 19(1):34. PubMed ID: 31035955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrast-to-noise ratio difference in small field of view cone beam computed tomography machines.
    Bechara B; McMahan CA; Moore WS; Noujeim M; Geha H; Teixeira FB
    J Oral Sci; 2012 Sep; 54(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 23047033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Settings on Implant Artifact Production: Zirconia and Titanium.
    Vasconcelos TV; Leandro Nascimento EH; Bechara BB; Freitas DQ; Noujeim M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1114-1120. PubMed ID: 31528863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Shokri A; Vafaee F; Haghighat L; Shahabi S; Farhadian M; Jamalpour MR
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Sep; 22(1):156. PubMed ID: 36057551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does the size of an object containing dental implant affect the expression of artifacts in cone beam computed tomography imaging?
    Moshfeghi M; Safi Y; Różyło-Kalinowska I; Gandomi S
    Head Face Med; 2022 Jun; 18(1):20. PubMed ID: 35765076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality for visualization of cracks and fine endodontic structures using 10 CBCT devices with various scanning protocols and artefact conditions.
    Pinto JC; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Leite AF; Wanderley VA; Pauwels R; Oliveira ML; Jacobs R; Tanomaru-Filho M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4001. PubMed ID: 36899046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mapping artifacts generated in a tooth adjacent to titanium and zirconia implants located in the endomass and exomass in cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study.
    Andrade-Bortoletto MFS; Fontenele RC; Farias-Gomes A; Freitas DQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Jan; 137(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 37838553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative assessment of subjective image quality of cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Kolsuz E; Kurt H; Yüksel S; Paksoy C
    J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 53(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22167037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29.
    Costa ALF; Fardim KAC; Mantoani JM; Ricardo ALF; Jardini MAN; Orhan K; de Castro Lopes SLP
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1362473. PubMed ID: 35295958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a metal artefact reduction tool on different positions of a metal object in the FOV.
    Queiroz PM; Santaella GM; da Paz TD; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160366. PubMed ID: 27910700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study.
    Ilo AM; Ekholm M; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Waltimo-Sirén J
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):670. PubMed ID: 34965859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The performance of metal artifact reduction algorithms in cone beam computed tomography images considering the effects of materials, metal positions, and fields of view.
    Vasconcelos KF; Codari M; Queiroz PM; Nicolielo LFP; Freitas DQ; Sforza C; Jacobs R; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Jan; 127(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 30528550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in different cone beam computed tomography scanning parameters.
    Queiroz PM; Groppo FC; Oliveira ML; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Jun; 123(6):729-734. PubMed ID: 28412235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts.
    Freitas DQ; Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180151. PubMed ID: 29916722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study.
    Niktash A; Mehralizadeh S; Talaeipour A
    Front Dent; 2022; 19():32. PubMed ID: 36865948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Novel Method for Characterizing Beam Hardening Artifacts in Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images.
    Fox A; Basrani B; Kishen A; Lam EWN
    J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):869-874. PubMed ID: 29571911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of voxel size on cone beam computed tomography artifacts arising from the exomass.
    Candemil AP; Salmon B; Ambrosano GMB; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Oct; 132(4):456-464. PubMed ID: 33422474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the expression of the volumetric alteration artifact in cylindrical and triangular fields of view in two cone-beam computed tomography devices.
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Coelho-Silva F; Rosado LPL; Freitas DQ; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1025-1033. PubMed ID: 34324084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of size of field of view (FOV), position within the FOV, and scanning mode on the detection of root fracture and observer's perception of artifacts in CBCT images.
    de Oliveira Pinto MG; Melo SLS; Suassuna FCM; Marinho LE; Leite JBDS; Batista AUD; Bento PM; Melo DP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Sep; 50(6):20200563. PubMed ID: 33565884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.
    Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Gröndahl K
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 20965675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.