150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34890610)
1. Dissolution and remobilization of NAPL in surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation from microscopic scale simulations.
Ramezanzadeh M; Aminnaji M; Rezanezhad F; Ghazanfari MH; Babaei M
Chemosphere; 2022 Feb; 289():133177. PubMed ID: 34890610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Numerical modelling of the impact of surfactant partitioning on surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation.
Babaei M; Copty NK
J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Feb; 221():69-81. PubMed ID: 30691860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of nonionic surfactant partitioning on the dissolution kinetics of residual perchloroethylene in a model porous medium.
Sharmin R; Ioannidis MA; Legge RL
J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):145-64. PubMed ID: 16274842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of source zone heterogeneity on surfactant-enhanced NAPL dissolution and resulting remediation end-points.
Saenton S; Illangasekare TH; Soga K; Saba TA
J Contam Hydrol; 2002 Nov; 59(1-2):27-44. PubMed ID: 12683638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimentally based pore network modeling of NAPL dissolution process in heterogeneous porous media.
Khasi S; Ramezanzadeh M; Ghazanfari MH
J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Jan; 228():103565. PubMed ID: 31718908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remediation of trapped DNAPL enhanced by SDS surfactant and silica nanoparticles in heterogeneous porous media: experimental data and empirical models.
Ramezanzadeh M; Khasi S; Fatemi M; Ghazanfari MH
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):2658-2669. PubMed ID: 31836978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surfactant flooding makes a comeback: Results of a full-scale, field implementation to recover mobilized NAPL.
Sharma P; Kostarelos K; Lenschow S; Christensen A; de Blanc PC
J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Mar; 230():103602. PubMed ID: 32005455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced removal of NAPL constituent from aquifer during surfactant flushing with aqueous hydraulic barriers of high viscosity.
Ahn D; Choi JK; Kim H
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Jun; 52(7):590-597. PubMed ID: 28281884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of surfactant-enhanced mass removal and flux reduction in 3D correlated permeability fields using magnetic resonance imaging.
Zhang C; Werth CJ; Webb AG
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):116-26. PubMed ID: 18676059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of surfactant formulation on nonequilibrium NAPL solubilization.
Zhong L; Mayer AS; Pope GA
J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Jan; 60(1-2):55-75. PubMed ID: 12498574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobilization and micellar solubilization of NAPL contaminants in aquifer rocks.
Javanbakht G; Goual L
J Contam Hydrol; 2016; 185-186():61-73. PubMed ID: 26826983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaction quantitative modeling of mixed surfactants for synergistic solubilization by resonance light scattering.
Xiang M; Lu Z; You Z; Wang X; Huang M; Xu W; Li H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(8):11874-11882. PubMed ID: 34558047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pore network and Darcy scale modelling of DNAPL remediation using ethanol flushing: Study of physical properties in DNAPL remediation.
Aminnaji M; Yakşi K; Copty NK; Niasar VJ; Babaei M
J Contam Hydrol; 2021 Dec; 243():103886. PubMed ID: 34507216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between DNAPL distribution area and dissolved concentration in surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation effluent: A two-dimensional flow cell study.
Wu B; Li H; Du X; Zhong L; Yang B; Du P; Gu Q; Li F
Chemosphere; 2016 Feb; 144():2142-9. PubMed ID: 26583297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pore-scale investigation of heavy crude oil trapping and removal during surfactant-enhanced remediation.
Ghosh J; Tick GR; Akyol NH; Zhang Y
J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Jun; 223():103471. PubMed ID: 31014903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of surfactant-enhanced dissolution of entrapped nonaqueous phase liquid chemicals in a two-dimensional groundwater flow field.
Saba T; Illangasekare TH; Ewing J
J Contam Hydrol; 2001 Sep; 51(1-2):63-82. PubMed ID: 11530927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In situ stabilization of NAPL contaminant source-zones as a remediation technique to reduce mass discharge and flux to groundwater.
Mateas DJ; Tick GR; Carroll KC
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Sep; 204():40-56. PubMed ID: 28780996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sherwood correlation for dissolution of pooled NAPL in porous media.
Aydin Sarikurt D; Gokdemir C; Copty NK
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Nov; 206():67-74. PubMed ID: 29033219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of theory and experiment for NAPL dissolution in porous media.
Bahar T; Golfier F; Oltéan C; Lefevre E; Lorgeoux C
J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Apr; 211():49-64. PubMed ID: 29573829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Density-modified displacement for dense nonaqueous-phase liquid source-zone remediation: density conversion using a partitioning alcohol.
Ramsburg CA; Pennell KD
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 May; 36(9):2082-7. PubMed ID: 12026997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
