BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34890662)

  • 21. Insights into the impact of polydopamine modification on permeability and anti-fouling performance of forward osmosis membrane.
    Yang Y; Song C; Wang P; Fan X; Xu Y; Dong G; Liu Z; Pan Z; Song Y; Song C
    Chemosphere; 2022 Mar; 291(Pt 1):132744. PubMed ID: 34743795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly.
    Saren Q; Qiu CQ; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(12):5201-8. PubMed ID: 21591607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A unified thermodynamic mechanism underlying fouling behaviors of soluble microbial products (SMPs) in a membrane bioreactor.
    Teng J; Zhang M; Leung KT; Chen J; Hong H; Lin H; Liao BQ
    Water Res; 2019 Feb; 149():477-487. PubMed ID: 30476776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhancing boron rejection in FO using alkaline draw solutions.
    Wang YN; Li W; Wang R; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2017 Jul; 118():20-25. PubMed ID: 28412549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Membrane fouling of forward osmosis (FO) membrane for municipal wastewater treatment: A comparison between direct FO and OMBR.
    Sun Y; Tian J; Zhao Z; Shi W; Liu D; Cui F
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():330-339. PubMed ID: 27570134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Membrane Fouling Behavior of Forward Osmosis for Fruit Juice Concentration.
    Li Z; Wu C; Huang J; Zhou R; Jin Y
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34436374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of tannic acid on membrane fouling and membrane cleaning in forward osmosis.
    Zhang W; Wang L; Dong B
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):3160-3170. PubMed ID: 29210702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility of H
    Ibrar I; Yadav S; Ganbat N; Samal AK; Altaee A; Zhou JL; Nguyen TV
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():113024. PubMed ID: 34139645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding the organic micropollutants transport mechanisms in the fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis process.
    Kim Y; Li S; Phuntsho S; Xie M; Shon HK; Ghaffour N
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 248():109240. PubMed ID: 31310933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate on forward osmosis membrane fouling and its cleaning.
    Wang C; Wang M; Li Y
    Chemosphere; 2020 Oct; 257():127180. PubMed ID: 32473407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments.
    Phillip WA; Yong JS; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5170-6. PubMed ID: 20527762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Understanding the Roughness-Fouling Relationship in Reverse Osmosis: Mechanism and Implications.
    Shang C; Pranantyo D; Zhang S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(8):5288-5296. PubMed ID: 32212689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hydrophilic, bactericidal nanoheater-enabled reverse osmosis membranes to improve fouling resistance.
    Ray JR; Tadepalli S; Nergiz SZ; Liu KK; You L; Tang Y; Singamaneni S; Jun YS
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jun; 7(21):11117-26. PubMed ID: 25941970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Synergistic effects of microplastics and organic foulants on the performance of forward osmosis membranes.
    Golgoli M; Khiadani M; Sen TK; Razmjou A; Johns ML; Zargar M
    Chemosphere; 2023 Jan; 311(Pt 1):136906. PubMed ID: 36270521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Customized thin and loose cake layer to mitigate membrane fouling in an electro-assisted anaerobic forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (AnOMEBR).
    Xu X; Zhang H; Gao T; Wang Y; Teng J; Lu M
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Aug; 729():138663. PubMed ID: 32361430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of temperature, pH, feed, and fertilizer draw solution concentrations on the performance of forward osmosis process for textile wastewater treatment.
    Karunakaran A; Mungray AA; Garg MC
    Water Environ Res; 2021 Oct; 93(10):2329-2340. PubMed ID: 34216398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Purifying fluoride-contaminated water by a novel forward osmosis design with enhanced flux under reduced concentration polarization.
    Pal M; Chakrabortty S; Pal P; Linnanen L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Aug; 22(15):11401-11. PubMed ID: 25813635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modification of forward osmosis membrane with naturally-available humic acid: Towards simultaneously improved filtration performance and antifouling properties.
    Guan YF; Huang BC; Wang YJ; Gong B; Lu X; Yu HQ
    Environ Int; 2019 Oct; 131():105045. PubMed ID: 31352263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The application of forward osmosis for simulated surface water treatment by using trisodium citrate as draw solute.
    Yang S; Gao B; Zhao P; Wang C; Shen X; Yue Q; Shon HK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8585-8593. PubMed ID: 30710329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Superhydrophilic thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for organic fouling control: fouling behavior and antifouling mechanisms.
    Tiraferri A; Kang Y; Giannelis EP; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(20):11135-44. PubMed ID: 23002900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.