149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34890794)
1. A unified view on beamformers for M/EEG source reconstruction.
Westner BU; Dalal SS; Gramfort A; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Oostenveld R; Schoffelen JM
Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 246():118789. PubMed ID: 34890794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance analysis of reduced-rank beamformers for estimating dipole source signals using EEG/MEG.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Dogandzić A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):840-4. PubMed ID: 16686406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
Engemann DA; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing covariance models for MEG source reconstruction of hippocampal activity.
O'Neill GC; Barry DN; Tierney TM; Mellor S; Maguire EA; Barnes GR
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17615. PubMed ID: 34475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Source localization with MEG data: A beamforming approach based on covariance thresholding.
Zhang J; Liu C; Green G
Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 24350784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatio-temporal Reconstruction of Neural Sources Using Indirect Dominant Mode Rejection.
Jafadideh AT; Asl BM
Brain Topogr; 2018 Jul; 31(4):591-607. PubMed ID: 29704076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. NeuroPycon: An open-source python toolbox for fast multi-modal and reproducible brain connectivity pipelines.
Meunier D; Pascarella A; Altukhov D; Jas M; Combrisson E; Lajnef T; Bertrand-Dubois D; Hadid V; Alamian G; Alves J; Barlaam F; Saive AL; Dehgan A; Jerbi K
Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117020. PubMed ID: 32522662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimum variance beamformer weights revisited.
Moiseev A; Doesburg SM; Grunau RE; Ribary U
Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():201-13. PubMed ID: 26143207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography.
Hillebrand A; Singh KD; Holliday IE; Furlong PL; Barnes GR
Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Jun; 25(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 15846771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commonalities and differences among vectorized beamformers in electromagnetic source imaging.
Huang MX; Shih JJ; Lee RR; Harrington DL; Thoma RJ; Weisend MP; Hanlon F; Paulson KM; Li T; Martin K; Millers GA; Canive JM
Brain Topogr; 2004; 16(3):139-58. PubMed ID: 15162912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of beamformers on EEG source reconstruction.
Jon Mohamadi Y; Poudel G; Innes C; Jones RD
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():2517-21. PubMed ID: 23366437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.
Gramfort A; Luessi M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Strohmeier D; Brodbeck C; Parkkonen L; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():446-60. PubMed ID: 24161808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
